• Welt@lazysoci.alEnglish
    6·
    1 年前

    doesn’t convince me it can’t be true

    That sounds like backwards logic - you’re postulating guilt based on the lack of evidence of innocence (if I’m understanding your point correctly.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      1 年前

      You’re not. I’m not saying he’s guilty. I’m just saying that it’s silly to imply there’s a conspiracy or something just because some of his alleged actions seem abnormal, when cherry-picking which of his actions you’re looking at.