Why YSK: If you are a US Resident, don’t lose your Social Security card more than 10 times, or else you might need to respawn 💀

Excerpt from Wikipedia:

In accordance with §7213 of the 9/11 Commission Implementation Act of 2004 and 20 CFR 422.103, the number of replacement Social Security cards per person is generally limited to three per calendar year and ten in a lifetime.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why? Because the system itself is arcane and could be done smarter? Or because the government has no business being able to distinguish between people with the same name? I need to understand this before going into a discussion with you.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Or because the government has no business being able to distinguish between people with the same name?

      Seems like an objectively terrible approach, considering people with the same name have gotten the same SSN before.

      Such an ID would have to be unique.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That would fall into the first category… Also, wtf? How can the same SSN be issued twice?!? It’s a frigging serial number, not a condom at a whore house.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Roughly 1/7 SSNs are issued twice. SSNs are recycled, used multiple times, all that good stuff.

          This is why it’s incredibly dangerous when people assume they are unique.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Sometimes there’s a limited supply of condoms and an endless need ….

          SSN is 9 digits long, one billion possibilities. While that sounds like a lot, that’s less than triple the number of Americans currently alive, and there’s a continuous progression of new births and older people passing requiring a continuous flow of new SSNs being used. In an 80 year average lifespan where you are holding an SSN,that continuous usage goes through the available numbers all too quickly.

          Even worse, numbers used to be allocated by area, meaning there were a lot of wasted numbers where growth didn’t match expectations, and corresponding shortages where numbers needed to be re-used because of local scarcity