• goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Again your logic was anyone fighting authoritarians = good and fighting poverty.

      Trump uses the excuse of fighting China to fuck up the economy with tariffs that not only does nothing to hurt China but only screws over the American economy. But since it’s fighting China it’s therefore good by your logic.

      Trump literally attempted to leave NATO at the end of his last term and frequently talks about it this term. If this is how Trump fights against China then I supremely hope he sails away and starts fighting for the Chinese, soon.

      None of that is at all relevant to why you claim NATO is fighting povert. Or why that logic can then be used to imply trump good

        • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And what does that have to do with your logic saying trump is good?

          Also a weird purity test for someone that wants a big tent party.

            • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              No you ignored it and deflected by saying trump wants to leave NATO which is unrelated to the logic of him being good because anti China.

              Not a purity test, a polarity test to separate us from enemies of mankind and themselves. Tankies are in the GOP base.

              Who do you think are the enemies?