• RockBottom@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    22 days ago

    Any indigenous tribe. But seriously it was not long ago that no professional fishermen anywhere would ever overfish.

    • Ridgetop18@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Only because they weren’t capable of it lmao.

      There’s at least some evidence supporting human driven extinctions as far back as some of the earliest ‘modern’ (ie Homo sapien) hominid populations.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Survivorship bias is so important to remember when talking about human societies. Even our perceptions and knowledge of indigenous tribes is limited by survivorship bias. Consider that there may have been many more “peaceful” or “non-greedy” tribes, but they were conquered by groups of people that were more violent and selfish. There must be so many tribes that have been wiped away without a trace, tribes we know nothing about.

        But the real barrier to this hypothetical “non-greedy population” idea is the matter of scale. A peaceful village of 100 people is easier to create and maintain than a peaceful global population of 8+ billion. Even if indigenous villages managed to build such utopias where greed doesn’t exist, their models wouldn’t easily scale to the world we live in now.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        The Amish are highly discouraged from getting an education of the high school level and beyond.

        Members are shunned by the community and family of they decide to leave the faith.