inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 14 days agoNo one in the GOP Hitler chat was a "kid"www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down13cross-posted to: fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.comconservative@sh.itjust.workspolitics@sh.itjust.worksnews@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1412arrow-down1external-linkNo one in the GOP Hitler chat was a "kid"www.motherjones.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 14 days agomessage-square30linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.comconservative@sh.itjust.workspolitics@sh.itjust.worksnews@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareCarvex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up31·14 days agoHow does their age excuse their behavior?
minus-squareRed0ctober@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·14 days agoIt doesn’t, but that’s the excuse JD Vance is making.
minus-square🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down1·13 days agoGreat now “boys will be boys” is a dog whistle. it always was for misogyny, but now it might be for fascism too
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·13 days agoI think it was more of a euphemism for stupidity than a dog whistle for mysogyny.
minus-square🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·13 days agoit’s often used to excuse male children or teens (or young men) of misogynistic acts. although originally meant for general youth stupidity. it’s a good dogwhistle because it comes with plausible deniability. it depends on the context.
minus-squareRizzRustbolt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·13 days ago“Boys will be boys” was always about getting into foolish hijinks. It has been co-opted by shitheads to excuse abhorrent behavior. And every time it happens there needs to be significant pushback from from folks to take it back from the bastards.
minus-square🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 days agosadly it’s hard to take back a term. shitheads missuse the term normal people then avoid such term now it’s a bad term any attempt at reclaiming it will be suspicious as if someone just wants an excuse to use that word. it’s mostly a slut thing. but with slurs it’s “easier” to reclaim, as the community affected by it, can choose to use it. in this case it’s different.
How does their age excuse their behavior?
It doesn’t, but that’s the excuse JD Vance is making.
Great now “boys will be boys” is a dog whistle.
it always was for misogyny, but now it might be for fascism too
I think it was more of a euphemism for stupidity than a dog whistle for mysogyny.
it’s often used to excuse male children or teens (or young men) of misogynistic acts.
although originally meant for general youth stupidity.
it’s a good dogwhistle because it comes with plausible deniability.
it depends on the context.
“Boys will be boys” was always about getting into foolish hijinks. It has been co-opted by shitheads to excuse abhorrent behavior. And every time it happens there needs to be significant pushback from from folks to take it back from the bastards.
sadly it’s hard to take back a term.
shitheads missuse the term
normal people then avoid such term
now it’s a bad term
any attempt at reclaiming it will be suspicious as if someone just wants an excuse to use that word.
it’s mostly a slut thing.
but with slurs it’s “easier” to reclaim, as the community affected by it, can choose to use it.
in this case it’s different.