• m532@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          It was the connections between the neurons that inspired neural networks.

          I think yours broke though. Natural stupidity in full display.

          • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            lmao yes child simple neurons are “the structure in the brain responsible for intelligence”

            I honestly don’t know who is more ignorant, the people who think chatGPT is intelligent, the people who think human made AI will never be intelligent, or you with your tinker toy level of conception as to what intelligence is and how it arises

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Just because they haven’t reached the same level as organic brains doesn’t mean the inspiration behind their design wasn’t that…

      • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        You and the other guy have a simplistic and childish understanding of human brain anatomy and “intelligence” if you think AI/LLMs are “based on the part responsible for intelligence”

        They were originally designed based on a certain part of how brains function - the part responsible for intelligence

        Exact quote the guy said, your other nerd comment calling me a fool said I was “arguing something they never said” but it’s literally right here you knob

        There’s no “part” of the brain “responsible for intelligence” and if he meant neurons, which he clarified that he did, he’s even more wrong. Sit down and shut up nerd