Paul@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1276arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: TooDumbToImagine
arrow-up1271arrow-down1external-linkWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comPaul@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square87linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: TooDumbToImagine
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agoFascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist A implies b, but b does not imply a.
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 months agoIs your assertion that this is not a fascist regime? Otherwise you simply repeated what I said in the first sentence.
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoNo, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThat’s fine, I agree, but that’s not what I said
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoOh, sorry I wasn’t trying to imply it was. Just adding to your statement.
Fascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist
A implies b, but b does not imply a.
Is your assertion that this is not a fascist regime? Otherwise you simply repeated what I said in the first sentence.
No, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist
That’s fine, I agree, but that’s not what I said
Oh, sorry I wasn’t trying to imply it was. Just adding to your statement.