Zuganov is one man. A powerful man, sure, but still only one. He isn’t the party as a whole.
I don’t know enough about Zuganov to comment on his commitment to Marxism but I sincerely doubt he’s the only one with power in the party and that none of the 160,000 or so members can do anything to remove him if they think he’s doing a bad job so I can only assume they agree with the direction he’s taken the party.
And when it comes to working against United Russia and working with United Russia while the more based option is to oppose it the smarter move is to work with them and not create instability for the U.S. to exploit.
Oh that’s what i wanted to know, thanks, yeah i agree, we can’t take more “based option” just because - we have to think what how and why we can do
As for Zuganov and KRPF of course there is a possibility for him being removed and party becoming revolutionary vanguard one, but the tendencies shows that at least for now, party is a net that catches everyone who wants to be agaisnt Putin, capitalism etc, but isn’t ready/doesn’t know how to go far enough (as with new generation, veterans of war in Ukraine, they are becoming members of KPRF in hopes for a change that they won’t deliver just like they didn’t for 35 years). So that current putinist regime (a capitalism with post-soviet aesthetics and fascism in disguise) can continue to be (doesn’t mean any other capitalist regime is better)
Writing this sleepy, sry for any errors, anyway thanks comrade for giving your point of view
Zuganov is one man. A powerful man, sure, but still only one. He isn’t the party as a whole.
I don’t know enough about Zuganov to comment on his commitment to Marxism but I sincerely doubt he’s the only one with power in the party and that none of the 160,000 or so members can do anything to remove him if they think he’s doing a bad job so I can only assume they agree with the direction he’s taken the party.
And when it comes to working against United Russia and working with United Russia while the more based option is to oppose it the smarter move is to work with them and not create instability for the U.S. to exploit.
Oh that’s what i wanted to know, thanks, yeah i agree, we can’t take more “based option” just because - we have to think what how and why we can do
As for Zuganov and KRPF of course there is a possibility for him being removed and party becoming revolutionary vanguard one, but the tendencies shows that at least for now, party is a net that catches everyone who wants to be agaisnt Putin, capitalism etc, but isn’t ready/doesn’t know how to go far enough (as with new generation, veterans of war in Ukraine, they are becoming members of KPRF in hopes for a change that they won’t deliver just like they didn’t for 35 years). So that current putinist regime (a capitalism with post-soviet aesthetics and fascism in disguise) can continue to be (doesn’t mean any other capitalist regime is better)
Writing this sleepy, sry for any errors, anyway thanks comrade for giving your point of view