Keir Starmer has defended his plans to curb net migration after an angry backlash from MPs, businesses and industry to a speech in which he said the UK risked becoming an “island of strangers” without tough new policies.
The rhetoric was likened by some critics to the language of Enoch Powell, and the prime minister was accused of pandering to the populist right by insisting he intended to “take back control of our borders” and end a “squalid chapter” of rising inward migration.
Some politicians claimed that his words had echoed Powell’s notorious “rivers of blood” speech, which imagined a future multicultural Britain where the white population “found themselves made strangers in their own country”.
When asked to respond to accusations he had adopted Powell’s rhetoric, Starmer told the Guardian: “Migrants make a massive contribution to the UK, and I would never denigrate that.”
But in words that could further enrage his critics, Starmer insisted that new migrants must “learn the language and integrate” once in the UK. He said: “Britain is an inclusive and tolerant country, but the public expect that people who come here should be expected to learn the language and integrate.”
[…]
Starmer was speaking before the publication of a 69-page immigration white paper that sets out details of how the government intends to introduce restrictions across all forms of visas to the UK.A new Home Office assessment showing the impact of changes to study and work visas and the introduction of English language tests said there would be about 100,000 fewer people entering the UK. It suggests net migration could fall to 300,000 by 2029, but the government declined to confirm a target.
Net migration, the difference between the number of people moving to the UK and the number leaving, was 728,000 in the 12 months to June 2024. Under the previous Conservative government, the figure rose to more than 900,000.
Starmer said that the current immigration system “encourages some businesses to bring in lower-paid workers rather than invest in our young people”.
Rain Newton-Smith, the Confederation of British Industry’s chief executive, said: “The reality for businesses is that it is more expensive and difficult to fill a vacancy with immigration than if they could hire locally or train workers … When considered alongside the large fees and accompanying charges, foreign workers are simply not the ‘easy’ or ‘cheap’ alternative.”
That’s not what I said. I said being a safe pair of hands in the UK legal system is close to fascism and then that the UK legal system is a tool of oppression and control a la fascism. Please don’t put words in my mouth or misrepresent what I say.
That is an absolutely insane position.
Working in the court system is not “close to fascism” and having laws is not “a tool of oppression and control a la fascism”.
You are unbelievably sheltered, and you’re diminishing the actual meaning of fascism. It’s not when a country has laws and courts to enforce them. That is beyond a clown take.
I haven’t said either of those things. I said being a safe pair of hands in the UK legal system is close to fascism and then that the UK legal system is a tool of oppression and control a la fascism. Please don’t put words in my mouth or misrepresent what I say.
Yes you have. That’s what you said.
You still haven’t explained how our laws and justice system is fascist.
I keep inviting you to expand and you won’t. Where’s this fascism?
Your take that if you’re respected in our legal system you’re a fascist, and our legal system is fascistic oppression is utterly delusional to the point of idiocy. I’ve seen many, many, many brain-dead takes on Lemmy, but this is easily in the top 3.
LOL bye now
It literally verifiably is what you said.
Fascist.