ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoSchrödinger's marriage ruleimagemessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1804arrow-down110
arrow-up1794arrow-down1imageSchrödinger's marriage ruleByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squareTyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 month agoHmm, no they’re also hypocrites, it’s not mutually exclusive
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·30 days agoThey are not hypocrites if they don’t believe in any of the stuff in the first place. Which they don’t. None of them do.
minus-squareTyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·30 days agoThat’s a pretty fair assessment, is it hypocrisy if you’re not aware of the irony, I would argue so, but your point still stands, they don’t care for the truth at all. If they did, they might have to contend with the fact that they are monsters
Hmm, no they’re also hypocrites, it’s not mutually exclusive
They are not hypocrites if they don’t believe in any of the stuff in the first place. Which they don’t. None of them do.
That’s a pretty fair assessment, is it hypocrisy if you’re not aware of the irony, I would argue so, but your point still stands, they don’t care for the truth at all. If they did, they might have to contend with the fact that they are monsters