• JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Your analysis is certainly pretty easy on you personally, though, isn’t it? Someone else is to blame, move on. Whenever you take part in modern society - eating meat, driving and flying, buying junk and throwing it away, everything basically - it’s someone else’s fault, move on. Personally I choose to accept that I also have some responsibility in the matter.

    As for the virtuous-native argument, I don’t buy that either. For one reason: population growth. A human civilization can never be sustainable unless its population is stable. It’s just basic ecology. Well, AFAIK, there is no premodern human society that has mastered this. Their populations are all increasing, just from a lower baseline, since they haven’t adopted farming yet. Their impacts may be lower because the absolute numbers are lower, but the trajectory is exactly the same. I know that’s not a popular opinion among the race-obsessed modern American left, but I’m a universalist so that’s how I see it. The color of people’s skin does not exempt them from responsibility. We’re all humans, we’re all implicated in this endeavor.

    Jared Diamond’s book Collapse contains an anecdote which is a possible caveat. Apparently some of the premodern societies of the New Guinea Highlands have, in fact, mastered birth control and so managed to stabilize their populations. But AFAIK this is very much an exception. Even if one believes that premodern society - without proper healthcare, mostly patriarchal, often violent - is superior to ours, one still has to contend with the population issue. Humans in my view are all the same. We all want the same thing, we’re just progressing at different speeds towards the same reckoning.

    • andymouse@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think we can pick one story and show one thing, and then another one to show another thing. Or hell, pick the first one again to say something different than the first time.

      History is a malleable thing, and what you base your argument on is a version of it, not sure it’s the truth.

      But the gist of what you are saying is that any people would have done what White folks did. Just give them time.

      You know, I don’t believe that. White folks were exceptionally OK with genocide, we always have been. Intergenerational traum, I guess, from the millenias of tragedy of the Continent.

      To presume that our white trajectory is the necessary trajectory for ALL PEOPLES, because ‘ecology’ (which is a scholarly discipline defined by who, may I ask) is… BONKERS.

      I’m sorry, I am sure you are bright and you seem well-read and intelligent but the idea you propose as an infallibility for all humans is completely and utterly bonkers.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The concept of “white folks” is entirely unscientific, it’s an American cultural construction.

        But yes, I am indeed saying that we just need to give other cultures time and we will all end up at the same destination. I don’t essentialize humans by their arbitrary racial characteristics.

        • andymouse@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think you miss the point of history and cultural legacies.

          I’m not making the argument that genocidal violence is in the genetic markup of white folks.

          White folks is broadly speaking “European-descended people”.

          I think this group of people is… Special in this regard. Most likely due to infighting and a long history of savagery - not due to their DNA!

          So… Other peoples won’t necessarily have this brutal background, and so would not necessarily have done what white folks did.

          I think owning up to the uniqueness of what it means to be white, or European-descendant, is an interesting project. And that project should not be tossed aside by some rationalisation that, incidentally, is terribly convenient for… white folks.