I appreciate the comment/criticism as well. I think I understood what you meant instinctively, and also because English is my native language, and because obviously, having US military bases in Germany, cultural transfer is going to happen between Germans and USians, despite not necessarily having direct or daily interactions.

It’s unfortunate that “globalists” and other neutral words and symbols are so often appropriated by fascists so that we can’t use them anymore when that is the most appropriate word, otherwise. It’s a pita to have to always type out “multinational corporations” or “states who seek to bully other states into compliance with their agendas, ideals, and currency hegemony,” and here I ask for appropriate terms for appropriated terms such as “globalist,” “non-semitic DNA, white supremacist, Zionist Jew,” and probably a cargo shipload of other unintentionally, but deeply offensive words or phrases I’ve used myself, not as dog whistles, but from sheer ignorance of more appropriate concise terms; but also it has me pause and search myself for liberal brainworms because it wasn’t that many years since I stopped conflating “Jew” with “Zionist” (maybe two decades, consciously, less subconsciously, it was multigenerational subconscious conditioning, in my considered but humble opinion), for example. Plus in certain regions, both Germans and USians seem much more direct than others from the same regions, perhaps because diplomacy is too often a nice way to hide nasty meanings, such as dog whistling, and probably for myself, some degree of divergence, from whatever causes I’ve discussed elsewhere. In interpersonal conversations, it causes un/intentional interpersonal conflict, in international conversations, it causes wars, regardless of whatever diplomatic terms the intentional aggressors call it, but that’s no reason not to seek a bit more refinement in our conversations, I think. I’d never want to stifle or derail actual learning conversations.