• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The second graph is a fucking terrible graph as none of the data points correlate with a specific time which would be needed to make a proper comparison to the graph on the left.

    If you thought this made sense you are mistaken. OP likely knows fuckall about economics

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Alright, why do we need the timestamp on the second graph? They appear to show the same axes and the first graph makes no mention of time-dependence.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      first if all rude, downvoted and blocked.

      second of all, the graph on the left doesn’t show time either. or technically it does, both do, because they are enrapped in the rate axis (which is change over time).

      third of all it’s a meme. stupid idiot OP’s opinion is that economics has historically been used as a tool to oppress and that overly simplified expressions of the economy bolster the manufactured consent for that oppression.

      you’re just confused and angry tho so chill.