Since returning to the White House on Jan. 20, Donald Trump has imposed one-sided tariffs on the European Union, forced the bloc to commit to buying vast quantities of American natural gas, and effectively threatened annexation of Greenland. The latest indignity for Europe includes a White House National Security Strategy that calls on far-right parties to muster patriotic resistance to European policies. Instead of standing up to this blatant foreign interference, EU leaders have repeatedly tried to appease Trump and avoid any possible escalations of tension — even at the cost of their dignity. Examples include European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen weakening EU environmental and digital regulations in line with American demands, and NATO Secretary General Marc Rutte addressing Trump as “daddy” in front of the world’s media. Trump may be the proximate cause of this annus horribilis for the EU. But the reasons for subservience run far deeper, says Dave Keating, a broadcaster and the author of a new book, The Owned Continent. A key factor is US command and control over the NATO military alliance, which Europe has relied on for protection from Russia for nearly eight decades. Trump and Maga are now openly exploiting that military dependency, amid Russia’s assault on Ukraine, to block European regulation of tech oligarchs and fossil fuels. “Never before has there been an explicit connection from the US government between the military protectorate and EU policy,” says Dave, who says the extortion is “a first” for the Trump administration. Another factor behind the European reluctance to treat the US in a more adversarial fashion, even as Maga amps up its belligerence, is the pervasiveness of American culture through cinema, news media, social media and streaming platforms. “Europeans are inundated by American culture from birth” says Dave. That also makes it “hard to accept that the US is a threat.” Freeing Europe from its long vassalage is a strategic priority that starts with creation sovereign EU defense capabilities, says Dave. But that would require acknowledging that France was right to resist reliance on US military systems and hardware. It also would require Europe to make a decisive break with Atlanticism, an ideology that prioritizes NATO and that remains deeply entrenched among EU elites and in Poland and the Baltics. But Atlanticism may be an increasingly hard sell. It relies on increasingly implausible assumptions: that the US will keep large numbers of troops in Europe and uphold its mutual defense commitment under the NATO treaty despite abundant evidence otherwise. “At what point do citizens say, ‘enough is enough, we’ve had it with these centrist European leaders lying to us, gaslighting us’?” Dave asks. “If Europeans keep electing these people, then they are signing their own death warrant as a sovereign continent.”

SOMO report on the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.

The Authoritarian Stack project on the threat posed by tech billionaires.

Mp3: https://www.buzzsprout.com/178148/episodes/18370429-ep-123-owned-extorted-and-gaslit.mp3

  • dzsimbo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    The EU link broke during copypaste.

    I think it’s worth a read, it hits harder when you read about this stuff in beaurocratese. Here’s the part about Europe, but it might also interest people, that US is still adamant on Taiwanese independance. Anyhow, here ya go:

    On Europe, the 2025 NSS lists, among the top security priorities for the US, reestablishing ‘strategic stability’ with Russia, enabling Europe to develop military capabilities to defend itself, preventing Europe from being dominated by an adversarial power, and ending the perception of NATO being a perpetually expanding alliance. The document’s rhetoric on culture wars targets Europe unlike any other region mentioned in the NSS. Europe is criticised both for its economic decline and for its ‘migration policies that are transforming the continent and creating … loss of national identities’, and for facing ‘a real … prospect of civilizational erasure’. The EU is only mentioned once, when it is associated with ‘other transnational bodies that undermine political liberty’. At the same time, Europe is described as ‘strategically and culturally vital’ to the US, and the NSS proposes ‘cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations’, and supporting European nations operating ‘as a group of aligned sovereign nations’