Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ā¦ as it gets better, weāll become too dependent.
āall of this growth is for a new technology thatās still finding its footing, and in many applicationsāeducation, medical advice, legal analysisāmight be the wrong tool for the job,ā
For sure, and I agree. But that isnāt what happens around here. Instead we turn to panic rather than skepticism. We are cynical more than anything. And I donāt trust cynicism about topical subjects.
This wasnāt well reasoned objectivism. It was journalist and artist fearing for their jobs about technology they donāt understand. They generate a lot of content to generate panic. The mob saw the panic and adopted it. Youāre not a true lefty unless you accept that AI is some new danger to the threat of the lowly creative.
Do you disagree that AI presents an existential threat to our current way of life, and that a new way of life may be worse, and that we should therefore plan ahead before plunging in?
Iām going to ask you something and please think about it. I have a belief that media highlighted these dangers in the same way the right wing media highlighted the dangers of immigration. If I look at articles, the framework is the same. The details are different, but itās the same scaffolding. That puts my hair up.
So to answer your question, yes I think AI poses a danger. That doesnāt mean I donāt embrace it or look forward to it positively. I believe we need to push the other way. Embrace and seize it. Force awareness of it and force legislation or cultural views that puts it in a better place for these tools to remain open Source. We have to be the primary consumers to influence it.
Iād say I agree. Proceed, but with caution.
Also did I miss your question? I didnāt see one
No I started as a question and changed to a statement but didnāt correct š