I kinda miss a few opinions on the topic of “screw taste” here. 🥲

old version:

  • Remy Rose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 days ago

    No mention of Oval drive? As much as I normally hate security fasteners, I love those for being hilarious. At first glance it appears roughly circular, you’d be like “well this is a nail, or a rivet or something”. But no, actually you can unscrew it!

      • Remy Rose@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Right?! And yet AFAIK there is exactly one (now defunct) company who ever used them. I guess it’s time to be the change we want to see in the world 😈

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Phillips exists to auto center and prevent over tightening. This auto centers but doesn’t prevent overtighteninf so you can theoretically torque the head right off. Otherwise it’s great.

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 days ago

            and prevent over tightening

            That’s a funny way of saying “it’s designed to strip out and become unusable as easily as possible”, but to each their own.

            • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 days ago

              Oh it absolutly does that, which is why I hate it, but it was intended to so exactly that for a different reason.

    • heatofignition@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah, but unfortunately it has to protrude from the surface because the bit grabs the outside, which means you can also grab it with pliers. Not the best feature for a “security” fastener.

      • Remy Rose@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Omg you’re right!! I didn’t think about that at all… It’d be difficult but certainly doable.

        You could reverse it so the socket is on the screw instead, but then it might be slightly more obvious that it is a screw. Also nobody makes those, to my knowledge.