A provision ā€œhiddenā€ in the sweeping budget bill that passed the U.S. House on Thursday seeks to limit the ability of courts—including the U.S. Supreme Court—from enforcing their orders.

ā€œNo court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued,ā€ the provision in the bill, which is more than 1,000 pages long, says.

The provision ā€œwould make most existing injunctions—in antitrust cases, police reform cases, school desegregation cases, and others—unenforceable,ā€ Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, told Newsweek. ā€œIt serves no purpose but to weaken the power of the federal courts.ā€

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    4 days ago

    Maybe if a certain political party hadn’t spent decades convincing its voters to disarm themselves, we wouldn’t have 90% of guns owned by fascists.

    Guns are evil until you need them.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Maybe if a certain political party hadn’t spent decades convincing its voters to disarm themselves,

      Which party was this, because it sure as shit wasn’t in the US.