• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, i mean if someone really wants to decapitate someone they can just go to the next best hardware store and get a chainsaw. This is so pointless.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why? Is there a legitimate reason for anyone to own or be able to easily purchase a ninja sword?

  • ladel@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why are they banning knives and swords category by category (e.g., zombie knives, ninja swords) instead of a broader ban?

    • withabeard@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Performance art.

      Anything in the UK carried for the intent to harm another person is a weapon. I do lots of low impact woodland/forest work. Axes, saws etc. in my bag. If I carried them to a Birmingham park to murder someone they would be weapons and not allowed. If I carry them into a woodland I have a contract to manage, they are tools and allowed.

      These extra rules/laws don’t change the above. The swords could still have been outlawed as weapons by the legal system.

      But… doing this means the perl clutches can sleep easy knowing “something is being done”

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It just occurred to me maybe the headline is about sword-owners who are ninjas, which totally changes the meaning.