cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/30924455

A few people pointed out that many [R]ust projects were MIT licensed and since then I indeed have seen MIT licensed projects everywhere in Rust. Then I found the link of this post and it looks like MIT was by far the most popular license in all of opensource in 2023.

Any ideas why?

  • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s an easy license to reason about, allows for basically any project to use it, and you don’t need to worry about trying to enforce it (Because the GPL is only as good as your lawyers are)

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      you don’t need to worry about trying to enforce it (

      By the simple expedient of there being essentially nothing you can enforce.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      There’s a GPL compliance lawsuit going on where they’re suing as a user under contract law, instead of as the copyright holder. Perhaps you can say the GPL is as good as anyone’s lawyers, in the near future.