• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    In these cases restricting their accounts to just DM’s would already help a ton, but having nuanced solutions like that for every platform that serves minors is nearly impossible I think.

    Why?

    • curled@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because it’s not sustainable. It’s very easy to just start something new whenever the law catches up. And as you said, the law shouldn’t be too restrictive, lest you lose the whole reason for having a social platform. Striking that balance for every niche and edge case would be a gargantuan task, even disregarding the technical requirements for something like that.

        • curled@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes? Instead of creating a whole set of laws tailor made to whatever techbros come up with next?

            • curled@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why are you continuously moving the goalposts? As I said I don’t believe there’s a good solution, but I do support the idea behind it.

              In an ideal, hypothetical world, the age check could be an anonymous government system where they can’t see what site is requesting the age check, and the site can’t see the real identity of the user: this would provide enough privacy and reliability. Unfortunately I don’t believe such a system can be made.