• optional@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was a known rule that every second version of Windows was good. 95 was good, 98SE was good, XP was good, 7 was good, but sadly they never released Windows 9, so we’re still waiting for the good version to come after 8.

        • optional@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          They were still good windowses for their time, especially when you compare them to DOS and Mac OS 9 which would have been the alternatives. For a fair comparison with professional OSes with full memory protection like UNIX you’d have to look at Windows NT, but there the preimise is true as well (as far as I can tell by googling, I only ever used 2000 Pro): 3.1 was bad, 3.5(1) good, 4.0 bad, 2000 good, 2003 meh.

      • AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m with you. 8.1 was underrated. Yes the start screen wasn’t for everyone, but I didn’t mind it. It was the last native Windows start menu that would just find the apps you wanted to run. No Cortana, no web searches, no ads.