I’ve seen this so much lately. Now anything that resembles high effort must be AI because no way an artist could actually do that on their own. It’s the death of art in more ways than imagined.
Truly the worst part of AI is all of the accusations against real people and their work. Even comments on Lemmy and elsewhere being accused of being AI, often when it seems the user is autistic or a non-native speaker, at least to me. Artists being accused as well. Even outside of accusations, a lot of commissionable artists are providing timelapse of them making the art in whatever program.
People have been removed/kicked from contests/subreddits iirc, and that could also mean being graded unfairly, or judged unfairly in a number of ways that could impact them financially if others believe the accusations. I’m not going to make a call on which is worse, but I don’t think one is so obviously worse than the other.
Gotta interact with your customer base somehow. For artists, it’d likely be the equivalent of getting banned off Ebay, Facebook marketplace, or Amazon.
I mean, for me that does come from a place of appreciating real work. If this post would’ve been AI-generated, I would not have cared about it at all. But that they built the whole scene in Blender, that makes it cool.
There are also tons of people commenting under clearly AI generated pictures that they are „photoshopped“. Those are probably the same people that called videos with face filters photoshopped.
I’ve seen this so much lately. Now anything that resembles high effort must be AI because no way an artist could actually do that on their own. It’s the death of art in more ways than imagined.
Truly the worst part of AI is all of the accusations against real people and their work. Even comments on Lemmy and elsewhere being accused of being AI, often when it seems the user is autistic or a non-native speaker, at least to me. Artists being accused as well. Even outside of accusations, a lot of commissionable artists are providing timelapse of them making the art in whatever program.
deleted by creator
People have been removed/kicked from contests/subreddits iirc, and that could also mean being graded unfairly, or judged unfairly in a number of ways that could impact them financially if others believe the accusations. I’m not going to make a call on which is worse, but I don’t think one is so obviously worse than the other.
deleted by creator
Social media is how many artists gather a following that earns them a living.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Gotta interact with your customer base somehow. For artists, it’d likely be the equivalent of getting banned off Ebay, Facebook marketplace, or Amazon.
Why? An artist’s livelihood hurt is an artist’s livelihood hurt; it doesn’t matter if AI capitalists or anti-AI witch hunters are the cause.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I will have to confess, I didn’t understood what you said. But I have to point out something:
We can cut the 4 last words of that sentence (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) /hj
Totally agree. A lot of people are adamantly hell-bent on finding if an image is AI or not. Stuck in Plato’s cave for real
I mean, for me that does come from a place of appreciating real work. If this post would’ve been AI-generated, I would not have cared about it at all. But that they built the whole scene in Blender, that makes it cool.
There are also tons of people commenting under clearly AI generated pictures that they are „photoshopped“. Those are probably the same people that called videos with face filters photoshopped.