The nonviolent wing marches and makes demands and does public facing stuff. The people prepared to be violent provide security, community defense, and the implicit threat of force if peaceful demands are not met. They’re not opposed, they should work together.
We’d all be protesting, striking, and refusing to pay rent if we had our schools getting bombed because of our government.
would we? also, “protesting, striking, and refusing to pay rent” is not the appropriate response to someone trying to murder you.
“Newly built North London tower block now home to 96 families” just doesn’t quite have the same… je ne sais quoi.
computerkidgivesthumbsup.gif
your surmise is correct
we just letting ai videos pass on the “Fuck AI” comm now ig
there’s a 0 percent chance he hasn’t already thought of this.
He’s spent the first year of his term systematically lobotomizing military high command. The only people left are cowards and sycophants.
edit: whoever has disagreement downvoted me, please correct me. i’d love to believe something else, honestly.
I guess I am assuming he wants to actually make it look like a real attack as much as possible. Probably he doesn’t give a fuck how sloppy it looks, now you mention it. He’d really just need the manufactured pretext.
Good god. Are you rawdogging youtube with no adblocker?
God I was so embarrassed watching the king of fucking england cringe at our clap obsession in congress a few months ago…
Huh? The claim is that it will find volumes more vulnerabilities than a human with the same amount of time, not that the vulnerabilities it finds will be somehow more exploitable? big “I knew we had lost the war when the generals’ reports of glorious victories came nearer and nearer the capitol” energy. And really, since AI produces so many false positives (hallucinations) we really ought to expect a lower-than-competent-human rate of finding exploits. The real question is “can we patch vulnerabilities faster than ai can find them?” and the answer, for now, is apparently yes.
edit: capital
yeah cool. ostensible belief and actual fact are two different independent things. I can say “I believe russia is just trying to reunify lost confused russians” until im blue in the face and point to the world’s various nations supporting russia’s efforts and say “look at all these nations that agree with russia” too. But if I go and buy a 4 billion dollar defense system from russia, regardless of what I publicly claim to believe, I am actually helping to support a war of territorial expansion. Fuck your hypocrisy.
wtf is vtube
I didn’t say confronting people with the, yes fucking braindead obvious conclusion of putting “notoriously friends with and protector of pedophiles whose name appears literally more than anyone else in the epstein documents, requiring literally thousands of manhours of redactions of specifically his name from the epstein documents,” and also “is a rapist” together would solve anything: there will always be people who will refuse to trust even their own instincts, let alone the testimony of multiple mutually corroborating victims, FBI documents with repeated, mutally corroborating anonymous tips about Trump individually and Trump in connection with Epstein (and I really could go on at some considerable length further here); I said it was necessary (about fucking time).
Sure. Let’s all just ignore the credible, repeated, unadjudicated claims of child rape for whatever catastrophe the obvious1 child rapist is causing to distract from all his other crimes this week. why not. yeah great idea. who cares about an uncounted number of children who wont even speak up for themselves for some reason. all those politicians around the world connected to this are probably like, low level and unimportant anyway. no princes or princesses or kings or presidents or pms or senators or entire national alliances are implicated in this. youre so fucking smart and reasonable dude, it was such a wise and ethical idea to ignore all those child rapes good call bro
edit: “Sure, he’s capable of operating concentration camps and bombing countries just to manipulate the stock market, but I draw the line at any suggestion he might have RAPED CHILDREN. Be reasonable.”
edit2: a thing can be necessary but insufficient in itself. the two are not incompatible.
edit3: he had to be talked out of pardoning ghislane for the love of all that is good in this world… how fucking obtuse can you be?
it’s about time for some people to rub two thoughts, “convicted rapist” and “pedophile protector” together in their minds for a few moments to reach the frankly braindead obvious conclusion.
Sorry buddy, people on lemmy despise advertising generally and even more so in organic community spaces. This isnt the place to advertise your app. I’m sure we’d all be pleased to hear about your planting and harvest!
honestly. Why are people shouting “pedophile protector” instead of the much more damaging and relevant “child rapist?”
i feel left out :/
I forgot about the same principle I just explained xD