No. She’d be in a psych ward for twenty years after her not guilty verdict wasn’t derailed into mistrial by a magat.

Because it could be a step towards polygamy, which increases the number of partners involved in a divorce. Imagine a scenario where one divorce triggers a separate filing, or a prenup being rendered invalid by the second partner becoming the sole partner, etc etc.

I think divorce aka family lawyers already kind of handle these things as is in the case of merged assets.

Yeah he just looks like a generic white reply guy. Of course, that is what he was in reality.

Should have just painted the neck tbh

That every rich asshole has a direct line to Supreme Court appeals is its own problem

The revolution will not be litigated.

I think this actually does a better job than most explanations of why this is a practical excercise.

Consent didn’t really enter the picture in a lot of the stories.

A little green, he’s got a UTI.

It’s like they’re actually a monarchy or something.

It’s like all humans are the same and will do terrible things when their culture combined both supremacist and victimization rhetoric.

“Bouncing”

She was trying to imitate Steve Jobs, not really a “tough guy” voice.

That’s because it’s all just waves anyways.

Their class interests.

Yeah it’s sarcasm

I can’t wait for the ensuing moral panic that will just increase sales.

That’s their business