

Thanks, I’ll check it out


Thanks, I’ll check it out


As a South African this confused the shit out of me at first.
I thought it was the hateful political party the Economic Freedom Fighters, who chant things like “Kill the Boer” at their rallies


Great to see, the more institutions do this, the easier it becomes


Great to see, the more big institutions do this, the easier it becomes for others to follow.


Yea I like her stuff, I’m a casual watcher though.
If she’s a POS I’ll change my mind on her, but I haven’t seen anything that makes her transphobic as some has called her


I’m trying to figure out what she did that makes her transphobic


What did she do?


What did she do?


Why?


Yea I don’t see that 10 point plan ever happening.


Wonder what Linux’s look like
It’s real, we live in the dumbest timeline


Is there only one winner in this system?


They took AGPL3 and added a clause to it under a section where you’re allowed to add clauses.
However in AGPL3 it says you’re not allowed to add restrictions.
So in their own liscence it says they are not allowed to add restrictions beyond a certain scope.
And then they break that rule.
So I’d say their extra clause, according to they liscence they released, is invalid


That’s first past the post.
And that leads to strategic voting, and winner takes all.
Which concentrates way too much power


Ranked choice should solve this.
If you vote for 5 left wing parties, with the last one being one you know isn’t going to get eliminated, then your vote still goes to the left


Ok fair, I didn’t read all the details, and too lazy to go through all those links to understand them and pick my favourite.
Which ever one doesn’t lead to stratigic voting and concentration of power.


Ranked choice voting.
Along with eliminating anyone with less than ~2%


It’s a bit discriminating not allowing Americans to ride the donkeys
Thankfully it seems like traditions like this will snuff themselves out over a few generations.
Edit: nope, I’m wrong, the ratio is still 40%+ women