Right?
Are these right wing politicians living in their own bubble or am I? Why would anyone want to be associated with the US administration in general and Vance in particular at this time? Who looks at this and thinks “oh, the venerable vice president of the United States endorses this guy, surely I’ll give him my vote”?
There have been about 0 good news from the US in the last year. If I were a politician I’d distance myself from that trainwreck so hard
It was down two days ago too.
People love to shit on GitHub for their recent outages, turns out it’s nontrivial to host a lot of software…
Yeah, you shouldn’t use GitHub anyways (I have a paid account on sr.ht that I use for my stuff and I think it predates codeberg) but codeberg has some teething issues as well.
Anyhow, yes, if you depend on codeberg, you should consider donating
Well, technically, it’s not broken, just slower
Firefox always has tabs, in fact even the Mozilla Application Suite had them since 2001. Gmail came out 3 years later. Though I would have thought that there were about 5 years between these events
That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn’t
I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you’re a member it doesn’t mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.
If Putin knows NATO is a paper tiger, why is he complaining about countries joining it? Why does he complain about NATO member countries on Russia’s borders? Surely a paper tiger isn’t detrimental to his interests? Why did they claim Russia is fighting NATO in Ukraine?
Total disconnect from reality
Eine GroKo hätte leider 51%.
I’d pirate it but I find the story just not interesting or worth my time.
I read Philosopher’s Stone about 25 years ago as a teenager and wasn’t impressed. Didn’t read any other because that one already felt like wasted time. Went to a movie in 2007 (no clue which one that was) and again forgettable. Not bad, in fact I still remember Die Hard 4 that I also watched back then because it was so bad. That HP movie? No idea about plot or anything. Another one? Thanks, I’m good.
Even if Rowling wasn’t a disgusting person, I feel like what I’ve seen of her work is just not great. It’s not terrible, but I don’t care for it at all.
But also, she can get fucked.
It’s a choice I can live without, I see the appeal of !! but usually, history is informative only, if I want something reusable, I write a function.
Ah, okay.
It shows that I’m not using POSIX shells
Yeah, I wasn’t sure there, the question mark was supposed to apply to all shells…
These additions are about user familiarity, not inter-shell compatibility is my point. Fish and bash are fundamentally incompatible. Just because they share keywords doesn’t mean they’re compatible. You wouldn’t say Rust got Python compatible just because it introduced a keyword or a concept from it.
Yeah, fish is a very comfortable shell in all regards. The standard installation does basically about 90% of what you typically want, probably more. Just very sensible in all aspects
No, but I feel bad when I need to deploy a big package for a bit of scripting.
For example, nushell is about 160 MB installed… which I find a bit much. It’s fine on my desktop, but I also have machines where this would be a significant addition.
I’m not the biggest fan of bash either, there’s a reason I use fish, though I also like elvish for interactive use (though it’s rather young all things considered) and in maybe going to use YSH for my next script project as that shell is very small (2MB or so) and yet makes sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ploi723hg4 this is the video, it’s about situations where normal filters have issues cropping out the content without spill or when some objects are reflective or transparent.
Hey, I’m well aware this doesn’t justify it in any way and this isn’t what any tech bro had in mind. I’m just saying there have been advancements in a maybe unexpected area of video editing. But I thought this was clear from three way I worded my comment
There recently was a video on YouTube about how they trained an AI to actually isolate content from greenscreen where the results were very promising. So while maybe not revolutionary, it did prove to be very helpful. Though we all know that’s not the billion dollar thing these investments were for.
What you’re implying makes no sense.
The ships passing are not “NATO owned”. They’re most likely not even ships owned by the armed forces of NATO countries apart from the US. And even if they were attacked, this is outside of the territory of the NATO member state, which is a condition for triggering article 5.