Tommi Nieminen

Staunchly Peircean pragmaticist linguist, phonetician and semiotician. Does translation studies and comparative literature too when time allows. Politically far left, deal with it. Localizes FOSS (eg. KDE Plasma, Vivaldi browser, Handbrake media transcriber).

  • 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2025

help-circle
  • Tommi NieminentoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldnice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Every gdn teacher in the world knows that, or at least should know. It’s next to impossible to create tests that would measure understanding, and actually using that kind of tests in real life would be so time-taking and slow that schools and universities would grind to a halt.

    As notabot below says, homework (and exams) are for the student. The “measuring” aspect in them gives only a sign that the student should note and act on (and of course, the society being what it is, the “measures” are also used in other ways whether we like it or not).



















  • I think a majority would find that unethical regardless. Majority of Americans, no doubt. Majority of the rest of the world, probably not.

    When I was beginning to work at the university, there was a professor who had started an affair with his student. Everybody knew about that, no one cared a s***. Later on, the student got employed at the department, and then they got married. The only thing I ever heard of it being talked about was that it wasn’t quite sure whether it was the student or her professor who actually did her “maturity exam” (a then-compulsory exam after finishing your MA thesis, the questions of which were based on the thesis).


  • Tommi NieminentoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldGallium
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The most curious thing in the whole mess is the revelation that Americans actually think companies should react to this kind of thing. Like the employer would “naturally” and “obviously” have a right to invade employees’ personal life and privacy.