

Nope, against.
Labeling certain kinds of arguments in a discussions non valid from the start, just for the reason of crushing said discussion, is unacceptable. Your arguments on veganist discourse are fine (and I appreciate the artwork) but this has nothing to do with moderation.
Also the parameters of anti-science reasoning paterns are too vague, this is not an academic platform. Let people be wrong and try to correct them, don’t ban discussions outright.




Thanks for clearing this up