You think that’s crazy, how about the fact that we have the tech to record and remotely view the conversation you two had from anywhere in the world. Computers, man…

https://youtu.be/Yio9_-5TMew

This guy knows the SHIT out of statistics!

People with old, dead, rotten brains recognize his Dad and Uncle’s name. It reminds them vaguely of a time when their own father’s were in charge of all the hard decisions, their joints didn’t hurt and they had an undefined future that could have been wonderful. That future has come though and turns out they are just themselves… they failed, nothing fun they wanted really happened and everything confuses them now. They feel like frauds about to be found out and forgotten at the same time.

So seeing something they think they recognize voting for “a Kennedy” makes them indirectly fell that their own Dad will magically come back to life, tell them he’s proud and then they will be millionaires and attractive people will want to have have sex with them and fix their iPhones.

It’s just that.

And they are bothered in that order? Fucking scoundrels.

Very clarifying. Thank you

I appreciate the expansion. Again though, we go to court to convict an accused murderer and the judge/jury rules eventually, but is there a preliminary statement by the judge in every case to reestablish for the record, the illegality of murder as an act?

My point is that it feels odd that there isn’t established law that states this clearly prior to the act where a judge is required to make a preliminary statement like this, where they wouldn’t with a murder charge in my experience.

Nobody said “words are crimes”? You sound like an eternal victim with that nonsense. Keep doubling down and leaning on that garbage though and watch when you magically end up included in the next group of targeted “illegals”.

Go read, “first they came for”.

You’re an “illegal” everytime you drive 1 mph over the speed limit, jaywalk or miss the trash can with since garbage that falls to the floor.

Again, how is there not precedence in law of or being illegal to alter or destroy evidence? You have a confident response by tone, but respectfully, I don’t hear any substance you’ve offered?

It’s as if a judge explicitly ruled that murder is illegal… Nice to reestablish, Y but yes, that’s established. I’m just trying to understand what this does distinctly?

Sorry, what in the everloving name of shite are you talking about?

You’re missing the point, if you continue with this language, you’re knowingly complicit in normalizing the idea that Ice’s target are “illegals” when they ate actually targeting anyone brown or perceived as resistance, regardless of any supplied paperwork, even when openly provided. Stop broadly referring to this effort as targeting “illegals”.

It’s a term intentionally used in this context to lessen the humanity of these people. You know that.

Is this not covered by standing law? When it is ever legally allowed to alter or destroy evidence?

Is the distinction more that typically this would be a slap on the wrist for law enforcement, but the TRO makes it explicit that there would be consequences?

Don’t use their language. These aren’t “illegals”. They are undocumented immigrants. That’s in general, and specifically, the goons are assaulting, disappearing and killing American citizens and documented people, women and children, old people, quiet, hardworking people.

Your point about data not supporting any kind of presence in Minnesota versus Texas and Florida is true. But “Illegals”, used in any context, only does work for the bad guys here.

What did injecting estrogen do and do you no longer do it? Why if so?

Through his pants

Every person they attack is the wrong person.

None of what they are doing is moral, justified or legal in a functioning society.

They are directly connected.

Substantiate to what end, Your Honor? Timeline is all public of their layoff timelines in their reality labs division, the partnership with Cameron on same work and the proximity between the two.

Can you substantiate what you’re now going to do with this information, detective?

Not really, they fired thousands of people right away to offset the cost of paying old Jim here. So he fundamentally disrupted all those lives, and the lives of the worker’s dependent families, and now he’s bouncing with the spoils.

Cameron is complicit. He just took a shitload of money from Meta

They’ll do anything but address the problem in Washington.