Ah yes, the very unbiased and fair comparison between murder and podcast incels. There are no real issues that men are facing…
I don’t understand why people can’t support women while supporting men too. I can. You can do too. It is not women vs men. It is tradition/sexism vs individual freedom/respect.
That is probably disappointing to hear for the bitches.
I don’t care for “celebrities” but I like my music human.
What is Conflict of interest?
Thanks for your comment. I think you stated it well and i think you are right about him.
But I think his comments heavily imply that her beauty is the most important value to her (maybe he means it from a business perspective and then he might not be wrong… sadly).
So i think it is lack of knowledge AND poor phrasing and reflection.
I am not saying that’s all that matter
she still got beauty […] it isn’t game over for her
“I am not reducing her to her appearance, but if she wasn’t pretty in my opinion, it would be game over for her” that is how this reads. Look at the votes and realise that is what you sound like. If you feel and think differently to that, reflect on how you communicate your thoughts. I doubt you would want to tell e.g. a close female friend something that she would understand like that.
Your whole statement circles around the idea that while you agree that she is less healthy, she is still pretty and consequently, you think she will be fine. And that might be a understandable (while sad) perspective from a business perspective but you joined a conversation about her health. By moving the conversation away from her health towards her beauty (a very subjective matter, which is especially important in situation), you are communicating that you believe that a focus on her beauty is relevant.
Now i understand that you might be reacting to other people’s comments and you feel like they called her ugly and you don’t think she is. But instead of stating that, e.g. by saying “while it seems like she is less healthy right now, let’s not call her ugly, that is just mean. And personally, i still think she is pretty” but by saying things that imply that her value is in her matching your aesthetic sense.
I want to assume that your heart is in the right but your words are not.
What a strange thing to say as a reaction to someone expressing worries about someone else’s health. “She might be unhealthy but she is still cute in my eyes, which is all that matters.” That is how it sounds.
Fuccbois and pua aren’t honest about their intentions.
She is honest.
It is. The memories…
Kinda bad comparison.
Beijing was always* beijing. Peking was just a european fever dream.
On the other hand
Constantinople was the offical name and got later renamed Istanbul.
I am with you but…
Bad code that puts out wrong information to a doctor or endangers my data, threatens my safety without me having any control over. No amount of my own expertise will protect me. Simply because I don’t control the situation. No amount of awareness campaigns will fix my issue.
But awareness campaigns have successfully communicated to most of us that googling your health issues will result in nothing of value, and usually a cancer diagnosis. I can choose to protect myself by not asking a llm. Like I protected myself by not asking google.
What i don’t like about this, is the ignorance towards every other field.
The ai is not allowed to tell you that you might have some illness but the LLM is allowed to vibe code the system that holds your medical data, or the software of the medical device that analyses your e.g. blood and provide the data to the doctor.
Systems and professions are interconnected. Chatgtp telling me that I have cancer is not as bad as chatgtp making mistakes causing my medical data to be stolen and sold.
I am afraid… most
Just ask a friend with the proper tools! I am sure, you have someone to ask to lend you a tool.
I am sure, someone in your neighborhood has the right tool for the work. #supportYourNeighborhood #sharingIsCaring
I wonder if their legal “protection” will work in court.
Intentionally absurd comparison: if I would host all the batman movies on a public website but make people agree to they are legally responsible for illegally downloading the movies, would I get away with that? I don’t think so.
Consequently, how much distance does there need to be between illegal activity and the company/person facilitate that activity?
Yes. My point was that the person’s comparison is shit. That genAI’s and human’s output aren’t the same.
In the usa, it has been ruled in the past that only human can have copyright. And if a human is not the author, they don’t have the copyright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute
You just need to point at the reasoning and ask “so it is moral to do that with human too?” Because the reasoning is the same and then ask the people if they can to live in a world where it is moral that someone digs out the person’s mother and do that and put her back.
I am confident that person will realise really quickly why it would be wrong.
The worst part… it works. E.g. on me, and i know. It is difficult to see these kind of posts, which are clearly misandry, and then hear people deny the trend for misandry, especially online.
OBVIOUSLY there is a shit tonne of misogyny, especially online and that is a big problem. But we shouldn’t ignore the trend to misandry. It is not a competition and we fight against misogyny better if we fight sexism in general, I believe.
But the posts make me feel like a shocking amount of people are not against sexism but just misogyny. How am I supposed to feel like those are not my enemy when I am opposed to sexism?
Then I spend time with the people that I love and I am good again but… it is fucking poison.