• 21 Posts
  • 1K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle





  • Dangerous? Probably.

    Bad? I mean, at some point, it becomes a risk assessment. Organizing at the risk of physical discovery might still be worth it, depending on your goals and what you’re willing to sacrifice. The benefit of these networks is that you don’t need tons of funds or construction ability to set them up. Whether you are an activist, a hobbyist, or a political dissident, you don’t need a government or business to do it for you.

    It’s not really my place to determine what someone’s best strategy is, as strategic factors are likely always changing.












  • …they could probably rove around finding people with these stations.

    True, though the benefit of these and other kinds of community-run decentralized networks is that it becomes harder to disrupt those networks. It’s not impossible, but they’re often built around an idea of, “But what if this node goes down?” so they have ways to address those issues or make it so that it’s easy to deploy new nodes.

    Still, if things are to the point that the government is cracking down on hobbyist radios, you’ve probably got lots to consider regarding the best ways to communicate with other dissidents and activists.




  • LoRA networks as a general technology are only as private as they are designed to be. I have the option of both Meshtastic and Meshcore in my city, and as far as I’m aware, they both use E2EE.

    Nodes and relays don’t store data for any period longer than it takes to relay a message, and even if they did, it would be encrypted. On top of that, they’re separate from other WAN/radio networks operated by capital interests, so they’re resistant (not impervious) to the influence of money and government.

    As a solution for activism, I think they are a great choice, but they are limited by the fact that you need a device compatible with LoRA and the particular network standard you’re using, as would everyone else.