• 175 Posts
  • 10.6K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Ukrainian housewives are not producing 155mm artillery or jets. But when a drone solves the same problem as a 155mm shell, then perhaps they don’t need to. Similarly with jets.

    I don’t think anyone can suggest they solve the same problems. I might argue that the conflict is asymmetric. The Americans are trying to invade Iran, not the other way around.

    Western militaries (not all of them, but Americans in Iran now) seem to love solving problems with cool expensive tools, even if not that well fit for the goal.

    The Western goal is to capture and control territory through terror bombing followed by an occupation.

    To that end, they need the kind of surveillance, range, and precision that drones lack.

    Iranians/Ukrainians aren’t trying to capture and control territory at a great distance. They’re trying to repel an invasion of territory they already own.

    They’re fighting a fundamentally different war.




















  • ICE literally wouldn’t have a foot in the door with airports right now if they weren’t filling in for empty TSA positions.

    ICE agents keep getting a salary. TSA agents don’t.

    Might be worth recalling that the original purpose of TSA was to rebuild social confidence in the airline industry for purely private interests. We’d made an enormous investment in airports, airplane manufacturers, and attendant infrastructure going back to the early 1970s, and were suddenly faced with the prospect of half the industry going bankrupt.

    Airport security was, in effect, a bailout of a failing business model.

    What we’re seeing now is a state level refusal to pay for anything that restores confidence in an economic institution. Terror is the only method they know how to employ. ICE agents are unleashed as a punishment, rather than a security blanket.

    You’ll notice that nobody in the private sector seems interested in back filling the TSA jobs privately (a possibility that is legally permitted but more expensive than any public airport or airline wants to assume). Meanwhile, nobody in the legislative or executive level wants to admit this is security theater and dispense with it entirely.

    All anyone knows how to do is terrorize you for flying, terrorize you for complying, and terrorize you for questioning these decisions.