Mastodon

Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?

  • 279 Posts
  • 305 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle







  • Welcome to the party, Steven Moffat.

    The improved quality of this episode is immediately apparent. The script is tight and quippy, and the titular child is creepy as hell.

    It’s tough to comment solely on a Part 1, but there’s a lot to like in this. The gag of the Doctor asking the crowd at the cabaret whether they’ve seen anything falling from the sky before realizing he’s landed in the middle of the London Blitz is great. The production quality is generally excellent - it really feels like a specific time and place.

    Following on that, Nancy is an immediately compelling character - sympathetic, and very authentic-feeling to the setting. Richard Wilson is also very good as Dr. Constantine.

    I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I think the weakest part of the episode by far is the subplot with Rose and Captain Jack Harkness, who we meet for the first time here. It feels incongruous with the horror vibes of the A-plot, and I don’t actually think John Barrowman (scandal noted) is as charming as the script needs him to be.



  • I gave this one a rewatch, and not only is it much better when you’re not half-asleep like I was the first time 'round, I think it also works better when you know the Spock twist in advance.

    Setting aside the silliness of the simulation, the actual story worked better for me once I realized that the re-creation room was manipulating La’An the entire time, planting the false Spock from the very beginning, and using the various characters to needle her about her feelings - both that she has them at all, and how she’s afraid people might take her less seriously in her job as a consequence of them.

    Not-Uhura’s speech is about the “Amelia Moon” stories La’An grew up with just as much as it’s about Star Trek itself.

    And Christina Chong turned in a really great performance throughout, too - this one should definitely go in her audition reel.
























  • You’d think watching one (1) episode of Doctor Who per week wouldn’t be too difficult, but there are times when it’s hard to squeeze it in…

    “Father’s Day” stands out to me because it’s a good episode that’s successful in spite of…just about everything about it.

    The weak production values that have plagued the season are still on full display. It’s shot in a largely boring fashion, and is downright maudlin at times. I absolutely hate Murray Gold’s choices, with those string chords that suddenly turn downward, which doesn’t sound sad so much as it sounds like there’s something wrong with the audio track. The episode does everything it can to be bad.

    And it fails. The story is great, and the performances are better. Shaun Dingwall nails the portayal of Pete Tyler, likeable fuckup. Camille Coduri is great as Jackie, as always. Billie Piper turns in what is easily her best performance as Rose so far. Eccleston is good as always, but since the Doctor is in a pretty dour mood for most of the episode, he doesn’t get to show a ton of range.

    The creatures (apparently called “Reapers” in ancillary material) are interesting, and it’s a shame the concept has never been revisited. The episode does a lot to establish that time paradoxes can be a thing, and it’s possible to do a lot of damage with time travel, even though it’s not something the series typically worries about.

    But in the end, the strength of the episode is its simplicity. Rose can’t help but save her dad, he eventually realizes who she is and learns of his own fate, and has to sacrifice himself to make things right.