Honestly, the card at the end made me believe it more.

It should be obvious that The Beaverton is satire

At least on mobile, there’s no header that says this is the beaverton. And it wasn’t until I got a third of the way through the article that I started to realize that this had to be satire of some sort and then had to look at the website name in the address bar.

Edit: I just took another look and there is a header but it is incredibly hard to see. And I’m not entirely sure that that’s not on purpose. I’m beginning to really fucking hate these satire sites.

It has been a fuck long time since I’ve watched it in its entirety. But there is a scene with a middle schooler(?) …I think all the main characters are middle schoolers… Anyhow, she has a moment of sexual awakening and is literally feeling herself out and gets blackmailed by the digital boogeyman of the series.

Mental note, gotta rewatch that show again some time.

Yeah it’s just the broad statement that I object to. I don’t think this study qualifies for such a broad interpretation of the data.

Literally no one cares. These live action remakes are pointless.

I don’t know if you’ve seen recent pictures but he has gotten fairly buff. Most likely in preparation for this film.

People complaining about the helmets.

Me: yeah, that’s a valid criticism. And a conversation about this is interesting.

People complaining cause the girl they used to masturbate to is now a boy and is taking film roles that suit their current gender.

Me: you all can go to hell. Don’t like, don’t go see it. I’ll buy an extra ticket to make up for your shameful bullshit.

That study included people age 18 and up with no upper limit and 30% of the participants were over 60. Not saying this is an invalid study, but there are a few caveats to the conclusion.

Studies of who? The entire human race, the Amish, people in monasteries? Without a specific age and societal class in there, such a statement might as well be made up.

Serial Experiments Lain

Uhhh…you might wanna rethink that one.

Not running down the anime, it’s one of my favorites. But it has some questionable moments. And though those do have context, some people who are sensitive to the topic of this post may find them uncomfortable to watch.

It’s understandable if you take time to talk to people living outside a major city.

You mean the people who’s only news source is Fox News?

Chicago also has some financial problems the state will likely absorb yo some degree as well which only further inflames the resentment.

Chicago is the financial backbone of the state. And major cities are where most of the population of the state live. Seriously, where do you think the money for everything comes from? The little podunk towns where virtually no one lives? The acres of rural nothing in the middle of the state where nothing but corn and racism grows?

Rural Americans think entirely too much of themselves. They are not the “backbone of America” they believe themselves to be. They are the leeches who complain the loudest about the life blood that goes toward anything but them.

Lived in NJ, now lives in TX, talks about CT like you know it. And yet, so wrong about literally everything.

The country club of rich elderly NYC retirees.

No, that would be Florida. Always has been.

New Haven, Connecticut is the poster child for the toxic money hoarding bigoted spreadsheet cult that wrecked the county under Clinton and Obama.

I don’t know what your definition of “bigoted” is, but now that you live in one of the most racist states in the union and seem to love it there I think I have a small idea.

You people produced JD Vance and the Bush Family. You’re vampires on the neck of the planet. You suck.

Vance is from Ohio, and HW Bush is from Massachusetts but moved to Texas after he graduated college.

So, you don’t seem to know anything about anything.

I wish you luck in Texas though. It’s fine unless you experience hardships of any kind. At which point you better hope your bootstraps are sturdy cause you won’t get any help from the state whatsoever.

So no idea why the article cites Georgia law…

Because there was another case in Georgia in December that they were citing as well. In fact they cite several cases in different parts of the country. The article is making a case for a supreme court challenge to these Constitution violating cameras and fines. The Australian cases just a viral opener for the topic.

Enjoy hell you insufferable prick.

It allows your prostate to fully relax due to being in a sitting or squatting position.

I sit because it’s less stressful and more healthy for my prostate.

This is the way

The headline that should have been.

I’m getting really tired of media outlets sucking up to Trump by glazing over how his shit policies are fucking everything up.

Edit: also, fuck Adam Schiff. The democratic party hand picked their successor to Feinstein and got exactly what they wanted, another corporate stooge.

The very same.

It goes deeper than that because the person who’s accusing him stated plainly that he was actually blackout drunk when the incident occurred and that he didn’t remember it the next morning.

Though I got to say for me, my doubt about him came several weeks ago when it was revealed that he had a Kik account he had been using up till less than a year ago that he was using to meet women. And if you know anything about Kik, you know that’s a very concerning thing. People use that platform are not good people.