• 6 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 30 days ago
cake
Cake day: February 4th, 2026

help-circle











  • “We had no choice but to escalate and start a big fire so everyone would see,” the regime insider said. “When our red lines were crossed in violation of all international laws, we could no longer adhere to the rules of the game.”

    As opposed to before when you adhered to the rules of the game? Bruh, c’mon bruh.

    “this war is going on gracefully with [Khamenei’s] designing”

    Well great then. Apparently everything is peachy.

    I do wonder where the balance is, because it has to be one. Basically they want to hit them hard enough to get them to pressure USA/Israel into stopping but not hard enough that they start seeing the short-term cost of this war as being bearable for the long-term benefit of no longer having neighbor ruled under Islamic rule.




  • A whole lot of slop when the article should’ve started from the get go with this point here

    According to the Times, Israeli officials estimate that they have destroyed 50 percent of Iran’s missile launchers.

    If that number is remotely true, then its an insane number.
    Maybe Israel is lying, wouldn’t be the first time. Let’s halve it to 25%. Even with that number, removing 25% of Iran’s missile launch capabilities in a couple of days is fucking crazy.

    And its that kind of thing that completely changes the military calculations. Sure, they’re a lot more expensive, but if you fuck up your enemy’s capability to launch missiles, they’re very much worth it.
    And missile launchers cannot be built at the same fast rate, it goes without saying.

    Its things like these that make me (extra) distrustful of western media. Do an actual genuine effort at estimating capabilities and stop it with the clickbaity slop, I’m tired.



  • But the 27-nation bloc isn’t capable of speaking with one voice, because the war in Ukraine (and Hungary and Slovakia’s lack of support) once again weighs in, alongside Brussels’ dependency on the US across a range of sectors, from energy and defence, to tech and finance.

    The author seems to forget another crucial matter. Its not just that Europe relies heavily on American weapons/military both for its defence and for the war in Ukraine, it is also that the Islamic occupiers of Iran have directly and explicitly involved their military industrial complex in an European war on the side of the aggressor.

    They have built an entire drone industry inside Russia and for years they have directly helped Russia in its imperialist quest of conquering Ukraine with the thousands upon thousands of drones that have struck hospitals, schools, residential areas, energy infrastructure, military infrastructure, etc.

    The Islamic occupiers are directly invested and benefit directly from Russia’s war of aggression.

    And that’s another matter that I argue weighs heavily on the European choice of silence.




  • Iranians have long carried a grievance that global powers exploited their country’s resources while neglecting their democratic aspirations.

    They are correct.

    History shows that popular uprisings gain confidence when they sense the world is watching – and supporting

    at least as far as our protests were concerned, I remember how good it felt when we got the “Europe sees you” response, really emboldened us. Who knows if we would’ve succeeded without international attention.

    Unfortunately, both in our case and I believe in this case too, Europe is slow to act. It has always been slow. “it’s not a bug, its a feature”





  • There are language schools, but I can’t find any details about full education being available in a minority langauge.

    I mean… Belgium literally has three different full-fledged education systems in flemish, french and german; all of them with their own curricula, schools, universities, etc.

    Due to their similar language they are mostly bilingual and can relatively easily understand each other.

    This is just flat out wrong??? Finnish and swedish are not similar languages and they’re not mutually understandable. A finnish speaker cannot understand a swedish speaker. Swedish is a germanic language, Finnish is blood uralic, its not even part of the indo-european family. Perkele, mita vittua?!
    Did you just go “oh, they’re both in the north, they sound similar to me sooooooooooooooo”

    Spanish is the only official language in Spain, only autonomous regions are allowed to have their own official languages per the constitution.

    By definition its not the ONLY official language if areas in the country have extra official languages.
    The very constitution of the country allows for co-official languages.

    And overall it makes sense that these minority-language schools are present only in particular regions. Why would you want to have schools for language X when there’s not a consistent minority that speaks language X in that area in the first place? Complete waste of resources.
    And naturally you can’t have schools for every minority, especially with modern-day migration, but its not economically feasible to have a school where only 3 kids can attend.
    If would’ve just said that not every minority in Europe gets its school, I would’ve agreed. That much is clear. But that is a very different point from the one initially made.
    The dominant model in Europe is certainly not one similar to the one China is pursuing, in fact I’d argue that there’s few EU member states that come close to that. And the ones that spring to mind are the Baltics - Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia - which is an entirely different bag of chips and a whole conversation to be had about how right or wrong they are to pursue something like that in their present geopolitical context.

    and Finnish have the same status as Swedish in Finland due to language similarities

    Please, stop saying that. The two languages are not similar. That’s not the reason for their status. Its because Swedish imperialism. They occupied Finland for centuries. To help you better understand, percentage-wise the similarity between Swedish and Finnish is CLOSE TO 0% (ZERO)

    There is a strong push to encourage foreign languages as secondary

    Strong push? I don’t agree with this framing. It makes it seem like its just beginning, like only now we’re moving in that direction. When the reality is that its completely normalized across most if not all EU member states.
    Teaching at least one foreign language is a long-term standard of the education system of EU states.

    In 2023, 89% of pupils in upper secondary education in the EU were learning English as a foreign language: this share was 96% in general programmes and 80% in vocational programmes.