

Are audacity still the good guys? Iirc the project was purchased by a company at some point and there was this whole tenacity fork thingie.


Are audacity still the good guys? Iirc the project was purchased by a company at some point and there was this whole tenacity fork thingie.


That’s exactly what OP is doing here.


Are these new speed limits only due to the roadworks or are they permanent? If it’s the former, I probably wouldn’t bother mapping it, or only if the construction lasts for at least a few months.
Mullvad tries to achieve anonimity by making your browser setup as un-unique as possible, making it hard for anything trying to track you to dinstinguish you from any other Mullvad browser user. Extensions can break that protection because now you CAN be distinguished from users not using those extensions.
Yeah, but that’s unlikely to ever happen as that seems to be pretty incompatible with what the mullvad browser is trying to achieve
Not Mozilla, Ladybird is.
Ok, but that’s not really an unusual color for honey. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File%3ATexas_State_Fair_honey.jpg
I feel like at least for central navigation elements like single word buttons, forms like “benutzys” are not so suitable. Because there will already be a usability trade-offs in using less established terms. People will understand a bit less clearly what is going on and how to navigate things. So things like “Nutzende” which can still be derived from the more commonly used gendered terms by using the regular rules of language will be much more legible and provide less of a riddle than a term like “nutzy” which basically invents new grammar. (in general I do actually like the “invent new grammar” approach to gender neutral language because I think it’s the most thorough and elegant approach overall. But it can also be a bit much/hard to comprehend if you’re not familiar).
It’s a pie!


Ich kann hier nur “Sanktionsfrei” empfehlen. Der Rahmen ist hier vielleicht deutlich enger gesetzt (Bürgergeldbeziehende), aber in Anbetracht dessen, dass die Spenden momentan ja nicht einmal ausreichen, um dort allen zu helfen, denen geholfen werden müsste, ist das vielleicht auch schlicht der sinnvollere Ansatz erst einmal recht weit “unten” anzufangen.


They also sell cars to people who are much more likely to be able to afford shelling out a bit extra cash to finance the transition to electric mobility. Given that maintaining a livable planet is not an optional nice to have thing, I’d argue they are even more to blame than some others.


To be fair Lemmy does allow you to sign up without any email at all (or at least used to, dunno if they changed it), so it’s not surprising that this goes against many peoples expectations.


You say it’s 50/50 based on your own experience/anecdotal evidence. Admins will probably be able to make that determination with a much greater deal of accuracy based on what they see happening on their instance. So it makes sense to leave the choice to them/enable them to make that choice, right?
Thanks for the summary!