• 2 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2024

help-circle







  • Ya - or close enough (10.11.3). My LAN networks are my server and workstation subnets (both /24s) and my external NAT (my public ip). I also have my reverse proxy address (from jellyfin’s perspective) in my known proxies. From there, my external users are set to allow remote connections, have passwords set, and are set to “hide this user from login screens” and my internal users are set to NOT allow remote connections and to NOT hide from login screens. After that, i just use my public dns for every device whether it’s internal or external and call it a day


  • You can already do number 2 (with some restrictions). You have to set up your networking tab correctly, use blank passwords, and uncheck “allow remote connections” for the “local” accounts. i have things set up so that external users are forced to log in and local users just pick a profile. If you also add your external users’ IP addresses to the LAN Networks box, they’ll be treated as an internal user too (though how you keep that up to date is a bit more challenging). It’s not precisely the Netflix experience but it works well enough for us




  • h0rnman@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldOf course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess man, I’m just trying to offer alternatives. We travel enough that we like knowing what we’re gonna get instead of having to worry if we’re going to be the next horror story. The airbnb app makes a point now of assuring you that the price you see is all-inclusive of fees - now why would they do that, I wonder. Ultimately, we’re probably some of the tidiest travelers. We just don’t have time to worry about rules changing at each place depending on how badly the host wants to pocket that cleaning fee





  • Appx and UWP are more packaging (like rpm, deb, msi) formats than an executable format. PE is behind everything in windows and the amount of effort required to change that seems truly Herculean, even for an organization the size of Microsoft. Heck, even executables for windows ARM were PE (as well as UEFI binaries). But even if you assume that they do go forward with something that insane, if they want developers to write software for it, they’ll have to publish the format specs so that gcc and llvm can implement them so that the tens of thousands of existing libraries could be ported



  • Sab might have its own mask settings - it would be worth looking at. Same thing applies here - subtract the mask part from 7 to get the real permissions. In this case, mask 002 translates into 775. This gives the uid and gid that the container is running under (probably defined in a variable somewhere) Read/Write/Execute, but anyone else Read/Execute. The “anyone else” would just be any account on the system (regardless of access method) that didn’t match on the actual uid or gid value.