

I didn’t even mention that aspect in my top-level comment because the check engine light is burned out. The systems and access to them were a mess before, and now I’m expecting medicaid cut headlines (and/or dropped people). Which personally, the idea of interrupted treatment makes me more wary than no treatment.
That makes more sense in pre-history where the issues were likely not caused by other humans (or if so, a hostile group) but instead nature itself. With modern long-term societal issues, framing it as an individual thing (“just a flaw”) rather than a systemic issue is terrible.
It should be obvious that poor treatment of a living being will have undesirable(/maladaptive) results. Like “oh, they’d rather not exist than exist here? Total mystery, must be defective, no way to prevent this!”. Now sure, calling people broken isn’t exactly wrong, it’s just ignoring why they’re broken.