Nooooo not myrient :(

Maybe, idk. I’m very much a realist, just in a very, idiosyncratic way I guess. But “anarchism of perception” is appealing to me.

Well. “Soulism” sounds very much opposed to my own worldview and politics, to a point where I’m not really interested in participating in that. But you can do what you want, obviously, it’s just a link to a pdf!

Based on the manifesto, I would suggest that soulism is just another model which divides body from mind (“matter” and “information”), and that it doesn’t account for the way political forces are involved in producing subjectivity, identity, desire, and the individuated bodymind. I had something like a psychotic episode related to mind/body dualism a few years ago, and I try not to engage with or involve myself with ideas like that now, cause it brings back feelings of like, chaos and instability.

This is a good read on the topic: Crimes of Perception: Individualism and Consensus Reality

Yeah, there can’t possibly be 10 people who independently think AI users are malicious and unwelcome /s

Nothing you’ve written here has any value. I’ve only responded because I’m stressed about the Venezuela stuff and angry that a post about it is LLM generated. This is just an emotional outburst on my part, not a genuine interaction. I may as well be venting to someone else about it, or better yet writing in my journal. Going to log off now and find better ways to cope.

How can you call people bots for being upset that you’re posting output from a bot as if it was legitimate material worth sharing? You clearly think calling people bots is insulting (to the point of equating it with saying that they’re not people), yet you don’t seem to have a problem with actual bots, since you talk to one as if it was a person. What exactly is your thought process, here?

Bad habits and poor decisions