

They are writing another scenario called āAI 2030ā (which we already discussed here) so I wouldnāt be surprised if they decide to ignore the elephant in the room


They are writing another scenario called āAI 2030ā (which we already discussed here) so I wouldnāt be surprised if they decide to ignore the elephant in the room


As expected. Itās grifting the whole way down, never about āsafetyā but always about money


Then hand me that hammer and letās get to smashing those data centres


āWe have to pick between the climate or AIā
No we donāt??? One problem directly affects the other. Stopping AI data centre build-out helps with stopping climate change.


I couldāve sworn I posted this here but apparently not: the first AI winter in the 1960s-70s which is pretty relevant to today


well great now Iām thinking about this


Youāre telling me that the Autism Spectrum is a spectrum and not just the quirky thing people have?


The AI safety company when they actually have to make their AIs safe instead of just making vague suggestions


AGIās ETA: Delayed (again) due to technical difficulties
came across this one when doomscrolling, pretty good article with healthy doses of skepticism. out of three commenters, one appears to be a rationalist (based off the āempirical evidenceā and āinstrumental convergenceā they mention) who tries to argue that we donāt actually need human-like AI for paperclip maxxing, even though every single AI doom argument is about smart-as-a-human and better AIs. Just comes off as goalpost moving


Appears so. Their doomposting shot them in the foot so they have to backpeddle


that the level of capability displayed there is widely available from other models (including OpenAIās GPT-5.5)
please god let them block ChatGPT access like they did with Fable. it would be so fucking funny


Dude why do we even need or want AGI?
MONAAYYY
Garyās been on a sneering spree this whole week. While good for him and everything, I truly could not care less for his neurosymbolic AI rambles and mostly read the stuff where he dunks on the current state of AI


Arenāt they still labeled a supply chain risk to the US? Feels like the US having their cake and eating it too
Although it is satisfying to see Anthropicās methods come to bite them.


On a related note Mythos has been released and as pointed out, the original āGPT-2 is too dangerous to be releasedā post was written by Dario Amodei, Daniela Amodei and Jack Clark, who are all Anthropicās founders. Same ploy, different model


Is AI profitable yet? a website that tracks the spending and revenue of leading AI companies. The answer is so helpfully provided at the top of the page


Of course! That āAI Black Death in 2 yearsā this channel also predicted mustāve happened while we all slept and the AI uploaded us all so it could torture everyone who didnāt contribute to its development!


Yeah in a lot of LLM critiques he prattles on about neurosymbolic AI way too much and it really throws me off
They also made the āYudkowsky is frequently, confidently, egregiously wrongā post