

If you’re talking the US government, then no, they don’t need political capital from the people, they just need capital capital and they can use that to swing elections and bribe politicians.
Regardless, some AI companies will inevitably survive. It is legitimately useful in solving a ton of problems that were near impossible before. Literally this xkcd. Now it’s not “I’ll need a research team and five years”, it’s “sure, easy API hit, we’ll just have to manage cost / use”, in the future, it will be “sure, we’ll just add a background task client side”.












That’s long and kind of interesting, but also super pop-sci-y.
The opening talks about how music physically reshapes your brain, but what doesn’t?
A professional athlete’s brain is going to develop differently from a professional chef or professional writer or professional mathematician. Whether you regularly exercise or take drugs or do whatever will all change which regions of your brain get more or less prominence and resource and change it’s wiring. That how the brain works.
The rest of the points all follow in a similar manner. Some are interesting and can be taken at face value, a lot have glaring obvious questions unanswered that make it sound like someone is boosting a nothing study result.
Overall, they don’t add up to a particularly interesting or cohesive point, it honestly feels AI generated.