flere-imsaho

reportedly they dropped the whole video thing, including from chatgpt.

requiescat in picem, sora

and frankly, i’m not a catholic anymore, and i did look around for matches.

heh. thiel’s sermons about antichrist annoyed vatican enough for its a.i. adviser to rhetorically ask “should we burn peter thiel?” in an article titled “american heresy: should we burn peter thiel”. as the children twenty years ago were saying: lol. lmao.

sources:

• original article in french
• the monastery’s summary

i highly recommend this excellent thread.

but they did it from first principles and without needing to update their priors!

at least the federation works even with auth fetch these days. (and yeah, it’s a nice jank, the very different reply styles, the way the posts + replies are handled etc.)

luis villa, who as a lawyer really should have known better, being self-reportedly a friend of behdad and a confabulation/war machine promoter decided to come to rescue, calling the above (a) attack, and (b) slander.

obvious take is obvious

yeah, that was too much to expect

perhaps the fact that claude was used in war planning will give them a pause.

you’re misreading the room.

call out his confabulation machine usage, and the block will be quick

my apologies, i tend to visually stereotype stalinists very badly.

i’m all for abolishing copyright on the first day after we have introduced mechanisms that allow the artists to actually earn decent money from ther work taking into account the specifics of the work. and no, UBI doesn’t count.

it is so nice to see the hard-mustachioed leftists to think that real labour happens only at a steel mill (because even kolkhozy aren’t real enough for them to care about the freedom of movement of the peasants.)

so, dude’s a stalinist (and let me repeat myself) and dumb as fuck. i fucking love the totalitarian left, in so many aspects undistinguishable from any other type of totalitarian gobshite.

fucking nazi safety officers everywhere these days.

ah well, that explains things.

this doesn’t mean that the paper is any good or doesn’t deserve mockery (i don’t know, i didn’t read it yet, and i’m not sure i have apparatus to make other than esthetic judgements), just that the conclusions the og skeet author attributes to the paper aren’t the paper’s conclusions.