• 0 Posts
  • 257 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2023

help-circle
  • The thief would have to prove that they were harmed by a particular person. Meanwhile such attacks are in public places people are moving through hit and run style. Police response times are long on non-emergency issues and the last thing the thief wants is police contact.

    A: The thief doesn’t call the cops B: If the thief does call the cops the person is gone, C: If they follow you are being followed by someone who tried to harm you pepper spray them D: the police do not meaningfully investigate the thief’s claims if they are alone E: if both parties are present the police don’t care about petty crimes they didn’t see and therefore can’t prove so let everyone go F: If you got harmed reaching into someone’s purse they are liable to prosecute the thief not the victim if anyone especially if they admit they had their hand in your purse G: if the thief does try to sue its in small claims court for actual damages which are small and creates a record of their identity allowing you to popularize their face and identity in the local area as the thief who sued his victim. Seriously start putting up posters with their face around the area. Loss of illicit revenue will be higher than gains. Hopefully they also get stomped later.

    Since all of these things are implicitly obvious and most importantly the first rule being a hood is avoid police contact we basically normally always stop at 1.




  • The funny thing is that you think everyone else is the problem when zero legit offers means its virtually certain your asking price was nonsense.

    People with used obsolete goods often have expectations of value pegged to what they originally paid for it rather than what it’s worth.

    Search your own or similar good on markets to see what other people are paying for similar or better goods.

    Is Amazon selling something for 20 similar to what you paid 50 for 5 years ago? Shipped to your door tomorrow for free? Well then nobody is driving an hour out to your place next Tues to pay you 25.







  • This just isn’t true because mugging and pick pocketing are different crimes done in different circumstances. People who are willing to risk a small amount of non violent risk don’t just accept a much larger risk in crowded circumstances where they are unlikely to get away with it.

    Instead they are likely to commit other crimes or the same in more amenable circumstances. Criminals have bad risk assessment not none


  • Prove it. Police response time for non-emergancy issues could easily be 30+ minutes after which i would have moved on. Also investigatory resources for cases that aren’t gift wrapped or murders are about nil.

    Civil cases for any meaningful non-small claims affair are going to start at 5000-10,000 and are basically unavailable for poor people. You aren’t entitled to a free lawyer.

    Small claims is going to be for actual damages which are going to be about nil and are going to get you near no money and 15 minutes of fame.

    Here is what actually happens. Thief endures a small amount of pain and humiliation and fucks off.

    The actual risk isn’t a hypothetical lawsuit it’s that it leads to a fight where you might be injured.










  • Let me help you with some math and logic. If 52% of people have flown in the past year and 70% of those flights were leisure then 0.52x0.7 = 0.364 or 36.4% flew for leisure in the last year and 63.6% did not.

    Presumably the 2/3 who didn’t fly for vacation also didn’t spend 3000 and change which is hint just what a bank told you it should cost not how much people especially poor people are actually spending. There is a massive disparity between the haves and have nots in America.

    Tldr: they aren’t living paycheck to paycheck because they spent 3000 they are doing so because shit is expensive. People also aren’t poor because they eat too much avocado toast.