- Necromancer by William Gibson gripped me hard.
- anything by Terry Pratchett. Hard to choose, but probably Feet Of Clay.
- anything by Ursula Le Guin, probably The Dispossessed.
Probably forgetting a few, those would all be in my top 5 though
Probably forgetting a few, those would all be in my top 5 though
Right, thanks. Still a super useful system, IMO, though I’m sure better versions are possible.
That’s true, but it’s gotta be balanced by limiting the fallout of extreme cases on other users
It doesn’t accumulate and display anywhere though, does it?
Maybe. They might also mean you’re an idiot.
Slashdot used to have a multidimensional voting system that would allow you to up or down vote something based on whether it was funny/insightful/correct, etc (can’t remember the dimension). I wish we had something like that. Sometimes it would be useful to mark a comment as “funny, but also wrong”
There ate multiple algorithms, but I don’t think any of them account for both votes and comments… I might be wrong though.
Tangent: the "scaled* algorithm, which normalises post ranks by the popularity of the community they’re posted to, is excellent. I recommend everyone use it as their default.
Oh. That sounds less like a library and more like a hire service.
I guess you only really need to be able to add pictures, maybe a barcode, and time tracking, right? None of that’s book specific.
I have 3 mastodon accounts, for different purposes. One personal, one more work focused, and one parody