• 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • The core systems seem strong but with lots of asterisks to keep them backseat to player agency.

    I think it’s more that the mechanics take a backseat to the fiction, and largely the GM is more responsible for that than the players. It’s definitely not for everyone. I run a regular 5e game and I suspect half of my players would be into it and half would very clearly say “no thanks”.

    lots of pressure valves to reduce the impact of unlucky dice

    That’s an interesting interpretation, considering that success with fear is just as likely as failure with hope. I don’t see this as primarily existing to make things easier for the players. Rather it’s there to make each roll more interesting.

    Fear seems like it only exists to give the GM permission to do normal GM things

    The communication around Fear could be better in the book. GMs can do normal GM things whenever they want. Fear is used to up the stakes by using special adversary moves, taking more “turns” than they can naturally, or interrupting the players in ways that would likely seem unfair in 5e.



  • For what it’s worth, there are definitely people using traditional initiative in Daggerheart. For one thing, the book has optional rules for an “action tracker” that limits how much an individual player can hog the spotlight. And I saw somebody on Mastodon who was borrowing a cool initiative system from Dragonbane.

    Hope and Fear are more central, if that mechanic turns you off, it’s probably not the game for you. Personally I love it, it gives us all improv cues when we need them, and it makes rolls more dynamic than just pass/fail.