Fucking hilarious comment in the conversation tree to add this comment to. (It assumes context with UN Watch and knowing what specific views this community holds of it). It highlights why I left the community and blocked a couple of people in this conversation. Feel free to do the same to me
Thats true, but I wonder if the release also biased that way. Releasing the names of more europeans to disrupt the region, which would align with their recently published foreign policy
Cold Open: Jake Pranks Holt - Brooklyn Nine-Nine
What’s your suggestion that avoids communities that are drowned out by US politics?
I appreciate the annoyance, I’ve had posts removed for US politics and occasionally there are posts I want to make in general communities that touch on the topic… but removing the rule would obviously negatively effect future content and the community. It’s got nothing to do with billionaires and I would call your comment pretty directly political, even if it’s an ideological view it quickly pulls into questions about what sort of system of government maintains that. But yeah, general communities should probably change “no US politics” to “No politics” to be more even handed
Walking is only not effective because others with lower ethics will take the money, right? And it should still be a skill cut and an image hit long term… presuming people favour not-fascism over more money, which admittedly isn’t realistic
Agreed. Depending on what portion of turn out though, I’m just not sure it necessarily fits behind the lead “you don’t know Japan”. And with that lead, it seemed like there was more to say about what Japan is actually like.
That said, they’re likely Japanese with far better English skills than I have in Japanese and I’m possibly being overly harsh
It’s possible for both things to be true isn’t it?
Your source mentions that she is popular with young people but that her party is not popular with young people. It also mentions that young people don’t have a high voter turnout. With Japans aging population and the information in your link, that could still mean that she is popular with young people but the net effect from young voters is still tiny. I couldn’t find any good sources for actually breaking down the demographics of her popularity though.
Also, why do a hit on run on someone trying to answer a question, and not take a shot at the question itself, or let people know why you didn’t try to answer the question?
I swapped from Voyager to this and far prefer Mlem
What do you use for call screening?
It’s great for Japanese. I’ve found it a bit hit and miss for other languages
🤦♂️ Don’t put words in my mouth to try to make an argument
live “trash streaming”, in which he was physically assaulted or humiliated as viewers watched live and sometimes donated money.
Its a video so tough to quickly scan so I didn’t watch it. To keep the block in that plane, I think that needs the forces to be to magnets pulling towards each other at the back and that seems like it would make the tuning hard since tightening / loosening each string moves and rotates the block holding the strings. Did they say much about that?
I think this is the wrong language to look for an answer. Japanese has a lot more mimetic words. I’m guessing anime has this pretty well established but I don’t read it
It’s like 3/4 of the way down before they seem to get to the point, leading a paragraph with the sentence “Do we have any recourse?”. I’d describe the next three paragraphs as poetry, poorly written meandering thoughts. It’s the sort of article that caused me to block lemmy.ml
I’d planned to try to list out the “hows” but it’s just too poorly written for me to continue.
I’m yet to see one of these individuals that screams “malicious” actually explain or link their rationale. That causes me to distrust their motives pretty heavily
Ahh… they don’t look at qualities from a century ago. ie. They’re not blocking joining because a century ago a countries currency was unstable. The criteria checks are for qualities / legislation of the country now with some of those measurements needing windows of time, but not as far back as you’re suggesting
And a century isn’t exactly accurate. Some terrible things were done after that and there are still improvements to be made. But it’s tough to make the case it’s a similar timescale to Israel or the EU checks
The list of articles at the end is just Candace Owens talking about other conspiracy theories. This isn’t news, why are you wasting peoples time with this? And why are people upvoting this?
Yeah, by memory Rupert Murdoch had his hand at that and in Aus and the UK. I’d love to see that reined in again too
One of the issues with me trying to understand more here was that this thread blew up so it was tough to keep threads straight and I made mistakes replying to a comment assuming it was isolated but it was answered elsewhere or the same person made a lot of comments.
I see you made a few comments and the other two seem to be pretty low information and not in good faith… so I guess I’ll find that button for you too