common W

how about you do like literally anything

oh ok, so you’re a bot. there’s no way a human being would think like that. someone programmed a bot to defend genAI.

a bigger photo. Jesus.

how is it like auto tune? auto tune corrects your singing, it doesn’t sing for you.

also, humans care? that’s kind of the entire point of art? we care where art comes from. find the best painter in the world, have them make mona lisa’s exact copy, and see if it sells for even remotely similar price as Mona Lisa’s estimated value which is probably around a billion dollars. anyone can “enjoy” an exact copy, no?

no. we care about art because art tells stories. human stories. computers don’t have stories to tell. they can imitate, but the best it can ever be will be as valuable as an imitation: not much.

since when is a little dick and balls malediction against society

you know what don’t answer that

not the same thing. AIGM is by definition not created by a human.

if i tell you to create a song about a recent breakup i got through, gave you some notes about rhythm and maybe what kind of feel i would like it to have, and then you went ahead and composed the whole song, played all the instruments, provided the vocals, did the mixing and editing and gave me the result, do you think it’s fair to say i made the song?

even when he criticized the shooting he had to call Good crazy. she was a crazy person, apparently. he didn’t even claim she tried to run him over, he said it looks like she was turning away from them. so what’s crazy about her? what a fucking dumbass.

yeah you know what i always thought hey this PC cost me a lot, i wish I could keep paying for it indefinitely.

Recently saw a video from an ex-maga, ex-mormon woman who speaks about these people and it was specifically about this face. she said they look like that because they’re doing drag. i see it. it’s performative gender expression.

one of the funniest things I’ve seen on the road was a big ass truck that had a sticker that said “attention! eggs on board”. i cry lauged so hard. like dude you be careful with it, why are you giving me responsibility

bold words from someone who looks like the stock photo for a pedophile.

“he’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting”

don’t have nearly enough information about it. by the mere sound of it i think I’d probably hate them but there’s much I don’t know about the activity and fish in general.

but i do appreciate that your question about fishing started with “I’ll bite”

happens when someone asks about something I’m really interested in… I’ve never had someone not regret asking me a simple question

two main reasons: one is that they were smart about what to tackle considering graphic capabilities of the time, for example toy story is a perfect first movie since everything looked plasticky at the time, so a movie made almost entirely of toys and furniture wouldn’t look so bad.

second is that they worked on their rendering engine specifically for what they wanted to create, so for a bug’s life they created the subdivision technique which is still an incredibly prevalent method to create smooth curved surfaces.

it also allowed them to model the squishy caterpillar, but again they were smart about their capabilities so they limited the soft body to that character and made the rest hard shelled insects like ants, grasshoppers, a stick bug, etc.

I don’t know this for a fact but they also probably worked on linked objects which allows multiple instances of a model to be reused without making your ram explode: the movie is full of things that are numerous: grains, rocks, leaves, grass, even the ants themselves.

finally lighting goes a long way to make things look good. every movie they made had great leaps in terms of lighting.

smart movie making decisions can make movies timeless.

as the founding fathers intended

that’s one way to put it

knowing stuff is liberal

what the fuck…

so AI psychosis goes both ways it seems