Yup.

I can’t even enjoy that anymore, knowing that he’s such a weaselly little shit head.

In a lot of Flash canon, his metabolism is/was insane. That might have been before the Speedforce took root as the extradimensional power source.

This doesn’t feel like a meme. It feels like someone actually believes this.

Duke Poop’em is heinous lol

In the middle of their march, if you could.

I mean, at this point we’re just doing theorycrafting for human monsters, but that concept just doesn’t resonate with me.

That concept is the “I have any itch I just can’t scratch” type of depraved, where it’s a compulsion. They need just another type of stimulus because they’ve done it all, and they fell into child rape.

But what I see from them, and the little evidence we’re allowed to hear, shows more of a laidback, nihilistic type of depravity. They have more money than they’ll ever need, but why shouldn’t they get a little more money by suppressing some poor-people’s rights? Why shouldn’t they buy that car, yacht, election, sex slave?

I imagine they look at Hunter Biden’s vices the same way we look at the Amish: “why are you limiting yourself to that when it’s so easy to get more?”

No, I think they know they’re into the most depraved shit. It was just the now-classic projection: condemnation for sexual affairs. You think they haven’t done crack with adult Latinas before sinking to raping kids?

They’re not the psychiatric definition of pedophiles, in the sense of mentally-ill people with anti-social paraphilias; they’re depraved monsters who know raping kids is some of the most illicit things they had yet to dabble in. It’s not sexual attraction to kids, it’s the rush of power from being able to break a taboo and get away with it.

Beat him to death, with hammers.

This is the sort of pipedream, hyperspecific indie project I only want to learn about after the dev’s been working on it for 14 years already, and it’s only 6 more years until it finally releases.

Feel free to copy my response in a reply to them. And that doesn’t change the contents of your own response, isolated in the exchange between you and the thread OP.

However, I’m not reading every comment, so I’ll take my own advice and apologize if I caught you in your least charitable moment.

If you wanted them to explain their point more, why was the only thing in that comment a aggressively rhetorical appeal to no one based on your presumptions? Instead of articulating yourself that their point was unclear, you launched directly into an attack. Does the dissonance of that not…register with you?

You didn’t even apologize for the unwarranted and unflattering mischaracterization of their message. You just acted like they were the one holding out from a civil conversation: “That’s all I needed to hear.”

Honestly, it’s a vibe.

They were prompting you as if you were an LLM. You’d get pulled off task and expose yourself

Nah, that could easily have a landed as a joke instead of a brain fart. And being funny is about 80-90% as good as being physically attractive.

We have to disband this entire government.

Republicans are obviously doing crimes but the Democrats are complicit to these in spite of the inexcusably lazy defense of “decorum”. You don’t stand on decorum when criminals are killing people outside and shitting all over your floor.

So you’re not against talking around the crisis, you just hate rhetorical questions. Weird hill to plant your flag on, but go ahead.

The second half makes it seem like there aren’t rich people in France. The only reason I’ll believe we don’t see more non-American/British/Israeli oligarchs in the Epstein files is because they had other islands closer to home.

Unless their islands are backed by a different or opposing power that doesn’t mind cutting Epstein system loose for public cred, I don’t expect the wealthy and politicians to do much.

Then grab a gun and shoot someone you think is responsible. “Everyone has known who the problem is for almost a decade”. Unless you’re not a part of “everyone”, that means you know and have also done nothing for almost a decade.

A lot of people are reasonably angry, and you might be one of them, but that doesn’t justify such a disrespectful attitude to someone else coming to terms with the same events. The same things preventing you from becoming the firebrand of the next subsection of this history chapter might be stopping them as well.

But, in their case, they openly poke at the collapsing façade of oligarchic conspiracies instead of just yelling at everyone on the internet that isn’t doing what someone thinks they ought to.

What are you on about?

Rape is a crime. A crime of nonconsensual sexual activity with another person. That, by necessity, requires consent for uncriminalized sex. Children can’t give consent and that’s why sex with children is called statutory rape.