This was either from April or early December. In either case, I’ve never heard this repeated anywhere else since.

Edit:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/artificial-intelligence/leak-confirms-openai-is-preparing-ads-on-chatgpt-for-public-roll-out/

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/openai-chatgpt-sponsored-ads

I do not believe their models are good enough to accurately and organically “prefer” one result over another. Not to say they won’t try, just that it sounds futile. How do you even train a model to pick advertisers over non-advertisers? Feels like they’re just going to start shipping prepackaged “assistants” with a big, stupid list of company sugar daddies to fluff up.

Thats not what they said.

You’re the one assuming things I never said. I asked how many they had at one time. Obviously, that entails ownership of cats distributed over time.

I’m sorry but 15 cats is a lot of cats. It’s a bit doxx-y (so feel free not to answer) but how many were you housing at one time?

She seems to be making some sort of statement, and that certainly can’t be allowed.

Too far of a reach, for me. There’s no way a baker finished inseminating his bakewife and was struck with an epiphany: “what if this…but a pastry?!”

The others are (debatable) etymologies and then you flip the order to make a horny baked good. Goon appropriately; be better.

He has many repugnant parts of his whole…being that should disqualify his ability to be a thought leader. That he plays video games to earn a living is not one.

I don’t love the cat. We’re housemates.

I don’t smell the cat’s breath because we’re not close like that. I’d appreciate it if you stayed away from my cat as well.

I do write fiction. Not professionally because I’m still working on the craft, but we’ll get there.

This feels like a shitpost that idiots misappropriated as a real method.

Why would you want a method based on a famously developmentally-challenged child? It isn’t “dogged perserverance despite setbacks”; it’s “he’s literally too stupid to evaluate his process and teach himself a better way to solve even the simplest tasks.”

Someone printed out a buncha shirts with only 8 solar orbits in the system. Obviously easier to lobby Pluto off the team than to reprint the shirts.

😢

Eeeeh, I dunno about that. If he had been an ass man, people wouldn’t have started making fun of people who like ass. They would have just continued making fun of how much he inserts ass into his movies.

I think even without association with Tarantino, first encounters with foot fetishism would be met with heavy skepticism/suspicion.

If my third attempt at anything was this good, I wouldn’t be such a quitter.

We won’t even get into some of the more egregious attempts to convert existing, real slurs into anti-LLM equivalents, which I have seen and heard other people recount. The word “clanker” is clearly being used as a slur despite lacking a vulnerable target to make it a slur in truth. Just as some people make jokes about a scenario where future androids try to reclaim it as “clanka”, it echoes something that I believe needs introspection from more people. Yes, I understand the concept of joke but the premise didn’t need explanation because the parallels were already there. We’re all saying that LLMs aren’t people, let alone vulnerable minorities, but that just seems to convince people to use them because they are “safe”.

If you make up a slur for a nonexistent group, blindly using it with invective, very few people will say “haha, it’s fine that they keep using these untargeted, but weirdly-charged, terms because the group doesn’t exist”.

If you want to be mad about “AI”, go behead a billionaire instead of making posts like “clankers should stay out of art. that’s for humans.”

Yeah, robots and LLMs don’t give a shit because they don’t think. Which makes it even weirder to try and “demean” it.

People could insult them normally: call them idiotic wastes of water, energy, and investment but they choose to create slurs that the LLMs can barely parse, let alone internalize. Robots can’t think nor have conceptions of themselves as anything that a slur can drag them down from. Which means the slur is entirely self-serving for the speaker. What need is the compulsion to use slurs, even devoid of a valid target, serving? At best, it’s flirting with taboos because they’re forbidden, like a kid puffing on candy cigarettes.

Also this isn’t a critique against your reply, just sharing a correction, but “distain” is so archaic that I think you meant “disdain”. Pardon if you did mean “distain”; it just struck me as odd.

I don’t think making her yet another dynasty would fix the Sequel series in any way.

Not an attack on you, I’ve just gone off the use of “clanker”. Because why do we feel a need to create a slur? It feels weird after some introspection.

That doesn’t follow smh. If Batman and babies are never in the room at the same time, the most you can say is that Batman might kill babies. In the absence of direct Baman-baby-murder observation, you can only make that claim if Batman enters a room with live babies and leaves a room with dead babies.

And even that is tenuous.

He didn’t…

It’s time to carry on, Angie. The Morning has come, so the Dream must end.