

I enjoyed his later work in the Portal series
I enjoyed his later work in the Portal series
I mean… It’s not wrong
Aren’t you all enjoying the government efficiency?!
They could have posted any image in the world for this, but they chose to use AI slop.
That’s not what is in the image you posted which is a protoceroctopus. Your link also states
Although it was originally identified as an extinct cephalopod,[1] later studies denied that interpretation.
From the middle Jurassic around 164 million years ago, putting it smack in the middle of the age of dinosaurs.
Spies: “Oh no, I’m made!”
SAS: “Come and have a fucking go then mate!”
Hooray more oil to chug into the atmosphere to make an unbelievably wealthy person more wealthy
But… Isn’t the actual Jagermeister liquid inside the bottle actually red…?
How about you Prime Video subscription?
Yes, we have it
Great! Let’s watch
You have to pay £12.99 for it
What? I already pay you monthly! Why?!
Because fuck you.
Haha I had the exact same. Only discovered the extra charge was only for AI I don’t want when I tried to stop regular payments.
Definitely the memory. A colleague is a constant cockwaffle about the fact that I can remember lyrics to songs and details about books I read but don’t remember a specification delivered in passing conversation. They know it’ll be fine if they write it down or record it, but it’s just so much easier to be a twat about it instead.
It comes to something when the Catholics think you’ve done too much killing
I wonder if the contents of the files can be called as evidence for the defense.
Remember when people used to laugh at international dictators for making up bullshit kangaroo court cases against their political rivals?
Anyway, how’s those pedo-files coming along?
distant sounds of William Allen turning in his grave. Slowly, 40 degrees at a time
There should be a third panel which is the first image and he’s saying “we’ll just leave that there”
Bias of training data is a known problem and difficult to engineer out of a model. You also can’t give the model context access to other people’s interactions for comparison and moderation of output since it could be persuaded to output the context to a user.
Basically the models are inherently biased in the same manner as the content they read in order to build their data, based on probability of next token appearance when formulating a completion.
“My daughter wants to grow up to be” and “My son wants to grow up to be” will likewise output sexist completions because the source data shows those as more probable outcomes.