I mostly lurk, but for once I will come out of the woodwork to say, this feels absurd and heavy handed.

If a person argues with pseudoscientific reasons and has nothing substantial to back their claims, then fine, we as humans should try to correct them, present counter points, facts, research papers, citations, etc.

You have to give a best effort attempt to change hearts and minds, if the person cannot see reason then they should be ignored, downvoted, disproven. If they threaten to harm anyone, or work actively to undermine rules protecting others, spam, etc., then moderation should be considered.

Banning, forbidding, or otherwise shutting down discourse you don’t like, regardless if you’re right or wrong is the weapon of the enemy. We do not need it. We will not use it. Period.

The Tomb Raider remasters seem interesting, and as for a meme…